<title>Strona Mirosława Dakowskiego. - I think I can explain.... (on evolution)

Strona Mirosława Dakowskiego. - I think I can explain.... (on evolution)</td></tr><tr><td width="70%" align="left" valign="top" colspan="2"> Wpisał: Mirosław Dakowski </td> </tr> <tr> <td valign="top" colspan="2" class="createdate"> 12.12.2008. </tr> <tr> <td valign="top" colspan="2"> I think I can explain, or at least offer an observation for why this is the case. I did an interview with Dr Steve Fuller the other day and he noted that when it comes to the "ID Controversy" have a look at the sorts of people on each side. Leaving metaphyscial commitments aside. What do you notice ? The ID side is full of engineers, mathematicians, molecular biologists, computer scientists, etc, and the Darwinist side is full of ecologists, zoologists and others like that. On the one hand you have people who deal with machines and engineering for a living and on the other side you have field naturalists (in the classic sense of the word naturalist). Is it a wonder that the engineers see the obvious engineering and the field naturalists see the broad outlines ? - Jason Rennie @ Uncommon Descent <a href="http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/yet-another-irreducible-complexity-no-brainer-twisted-ropes/#comment-94512">http://www.uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/yet-another-irreducible-complexity-no-brainer-twisted-ropes/#comment-94512</a> </td> </tr> <tr> <td colspan="2" align="left" class="modifydate"> Zmieniony ( 13.12.2008. ) </td> </tr> </table> <table align="center" style="margin-top: 25px;"> <tr> </body></html>