"One in four [27.6%] South African men questioned in a survey said they had raped someone. ... [It's] considered a form of male bonding."

Contents

“White participants in gang rapes are extremely rare [but] the vast majority of victims are white girls. …
They are seen by their assailants as willing, right because they’re white. ‘The white meat is available’. …
Antillean, Surinam and Cape Verdean [blacks] see gang rape as something macho. … [Arab] Moroccans still are very clearly overrepresented in swimming pool incidents.”

“H Ceccato, V., (2014) calculates that over 66% of the [rape] suspects in Stockholm in 2008-2009 were foreign nationals and were characterized by being “ethnically different” [thus excluding westerners], while their average rape victims were characterized by being younger women of Swedish nationality.”

“0.2 percent of Swedes, excluding immigrant children, were reasonably suspected of rape in 1985-1989. This will be our default value from which we measure overrepresentation: …

– 23-fold overrepresentation for … Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia or Libya…
– 20-fold overrepresentation for … Iraq…
– 18-fold overrepresentation for … Bulgaria or Romania…
– 16.5-fold overrepresentation for the Africa category excluding North Africa and Uganda [note: not congruent with southern Africa rape numbers]…
– 10-fold overrepresentation for … Iran as well as … Bolivia, Peru and Ecuador…”

Important note: None of these facts and statistics here should be used to attack the individual. Governments and elites love to confuse the two, but there’s a difference between analyzing and taking measures against a group and doing so against an individual. Everyone who deserves it, no matter what race, should be treated with dignity and respect. They, in turn, should respect statistics and people’s right to their own cultural living space.

Suppression of ethnic crime numbers

For decades at this point the dominant liberal establishment of the West, obsessed as it is with Third World immigration, has been suppressing crime numbers on ethnic minority groups in the West. In fact, starting around 2014, major liberal foundations as Ford, Open Society, Carnegie and Rockefeller, together worth about $150 billion and discussed in ISGP’s “liberal CIA” article series, have even been pouring multi-millions of dollars into the bizarre Black Lives Matter movement. The result has been never-ending criticism on “police brutality” and “racial profiling”, even leading to random shootings of completely innocent police officers.

While something can be said for both sides – black activists and U.S. law enforcement – one essential and highly curious omission from the media and political establishment is any discussion of black crime numbers. It’s not too hard to see why: they’re vastly higher than those of the native white population. And not just in the United States, but literally all over the world: in Africa, the Caribbean, other Third World societies, and in Europe.

Obviously very high black crime numbers come as zero surprise to the average citizen, certainly not those living in urban areas. It’s only the top 1% in western society that wants to stifle any debate on this issue for reasons that are not entirely clear. Suppressing the debates and working towards solutions and keeping the peace would be one thing, but what western elites, especially in the United States since the Obama election and then the Donald Trump presidential campaign have actually been doing is inciting the black population against the white majority. This has partly been accomplished through the financing of endless, irrational protests that have labeled every Trump supporter a “racist”, “hater” and “Nazi”, but at the same time through the enforcing of political correctness and the hiding of ethnic crime statistics.

It must be said, generally it is rather challenging to find detailed, useful numbers on ethnic crime numbers due to this political correctness and outright suppression. Generally, governments and the media:

• don’t report ethnic backgrounds when it comes to crime;
• only provide ethnic prison incarceration rates without details on types of offenses;
• report on minority victims, but not on minority offenders.

All these tactics serve to at the very least leave open the “debate” as to whether or not white majority racism is the real cause of heightened prison numbers. And as the problem gets worse and worse due to Third World immigration, we see that it becomes more and more common for governments to all-out scrap the registration of ethnic backgrounds, especially in Europe.

In short, this white guilt promotion and unrestrained Third World immigration policy of western elites, all of it based on lies and lies of omission, is absolutely unacceptable. So why not put some numbers on the table here regarding black crime numbers in a number of different counties?

Hopefully these numbers will give people a sense of peace, in the sense that they don’t feel they have to allow anymore that the media and political establishment keeps pushing them into a corner by calling any critic of unrestrained immigration a “racist” or “hater”. Anybody with even the slightest contact with Third World immigrants, will quickly learn that Africans and Arabs do not offer the slightest bit of cultural enrichment to our society. In fact, looking at their crime numbers, they represent an incredible nuisance and security threat to our civilization, especially to young, attractive women and children playing alone or in small groups in the street.

To clarify the situation with kids, foreign children generally operate in larger packs, are less properly raised by their parents, are much more violent, and are specifically looking for fights. Moroccans in the Netherlands, for example, are notorious for this. As for women, a few months before putting together this oversight, I myself had to pull two teenage Moroccans from a Dutch student girl in a tunnel that for a brief second missed oversight by guards (who you didn’t need in the past). A few weeks later, at this exact same spot, I ran into a black guy straight from Africa, licking his lips at every student girl he came across while blasting his African gangster rap at full volume. All this, unfortunately, is quite normal these days. And liberal government internationally tell us we’re racist if we a little too strongly try to address this issue. That has got to change. And for that we need numbers.

Keep in mind: if you think there aren’t enough numbers in this oversight, that would be the fault of international governments; not me. It’s very hard to find these numbers and much of it needs additional analysis before they reveal the facts you’re actually looking for.

CRIME STATISTICS

Crime numbers on U.S. blacks

• Blacks are 7 times more likely to go to jail for all types of violent crime than whites – and 28 times more than U.S. Asians (Far East Asians keep than number down; not Arabs or Indians): [1]

• In the 1980-2008 period blacks committed 6 to 7 times as many murders on average as whites with black-on-white homicides being over 3 times more common than white-on-black. During certain periods blacks committed 10 to 11 times as many murders as white people. [2] The jail statistic above for 2001 indicates 8 times as many, which quite perfectly matches the much heightened historical crime rate among black people.

• Other statistics of the Center for Disease Control and FBI reveal black homicide rates between 7 and 11 times higher than white people. Black teens even commit up to 20 times as many murders as white teens. Latinos/Hispanics commit on average approximately 3.5 times as many murders as whites.

• FBI data from 2013 reveals that black people kill other blacks at a rate 5x higher than white people kill white people. However, the same data shows that black people kill white people 12x more often than the other way around.

• Black-on-white robberies are 12 times more common than white-on-black. [3] 2012-2013 statistics from the Bureau of Justice Statistics, released in 2015, reveal that blacks are 27 times more likely to commit violent crimes against white people than in reverse. Black-on-white violent crimes caused 560,600 victims compared to 99,403 vice versa. That’s 5.64 times more, but blacks only constitute 13.2% of the population with whites 62.1%, so 5.64 x 4.7 (62.1/13.2) gives us 27 times more violent black-on-white crime than white-on-black. [4]

• A 2018 Bureau of Justice Statistics report reveal 42x higher black-on-white violent crime numbers than in reverse and 6x higher hispanic-on-white violent crime than in reverse:

• A November 1992 Bureau of Justice Statistics report entitled ‘Patterns of Robbery and Burglary in 9 States, 1984-88’, on page 1, reads:
  
  
  “Most arrested for robbery were black (63%), and most arrested for burglary, white (64%).”
  
  
  At the time blacks consisted 12% of the population versus 78% white and 8% Hispanic/Latino. So we have a minimum 5.25x overreprentation for blacks (63/12). Latino’s are more criminal as whites, with the former seemingly being labeled as “white” in this study. Therefore, an overrepresentation of 6x compared to non-Hispanic whites seems quite fair.

• June 2, 2020, Wall Street Journal, ‘The Myth of Systemic Police Racism; Hold officers accountable who use excessive force. But there’s no evidence of widespread racial bias.’:
  
  
  “In 2018, the latest year for which such data have been published, African-Americans made up 53% of known homicide offenders in the U.S. and commit about 60% of robberies, though they are 13% of the population.“
  
  
  This would indicate a 4.6x overrepresentation if the U.S. was all white for the rest. However, the white poulation had dropped to 60.5% at this point, with about 18% more criminal Latinos lobbed in with “whites”. It may well be that this is the cause of the lower overrepresentation of whites compared to the mid 1980s. If we do a rough correction, again a 6x overrepresentation seems quite fair.

• Looking at Bureau of Justice Statistics data for 2008 (as a general example) [5], we find that U.S. blacks are 5.5x more likely to be involved in incidents of gang rape.
  
  These numbers actually still are quite low compared to black immigrants from Africa and the Caribbean into Europe, which might have a lot to do with the fact that these days rapists, not just child rapists, are despised in the American prison system in particular and are actively targeted by black and Latino gangs for murder, torture, or at the very least a good beat down.

• A 1999 study published in The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice involved an analysis of eight past prison rape studies dating back to 1968, 1976, 1978, 1980, 1982, 1984 and 1990. All of them concluded that A) blacks commit about 13 times more prison rape than whites; B) almost always target young white males; C) do so out of racist motivation; and D) generally deny during interviews that their own race is overrepresented. The report concluded:
  
  

  “The issue of blacks exclusively raping whites has been substantially documented since the 1960s, well prior to the overcrowding [and] long before the emergence of prison gangs. … Whites continue to be raped more severely and frequently and at a disproportionate rate than any other racial or ethnic group. … The victims are almost always young white prisoners. … “These sexual ‘conquests’ serve to establish [black’s] status and dominance… Their answers were usually ‘now it’s their turn’.”

  
  The percentages (but not absolute numbers) for black rape declined as Latinos started entering America’s prison system in the 1970s. Already in 1980 it was concluded that Latinos too rape whites at much higher frequency in prison and with the same racist motivations. The 1980 study put black rape at 80%, hispanic rape at 14% and white rape at 6%. A 1982 study by different researchers concluded:
  
  

  “It is unusual for either black or Chicano youngsters to be turned out [especially by whites]. The blacks and Mexicans-Americans tend to look out for their own and will not turn out one of their own race.” [6]

  

  There have been more studies. A 1989 ones in which black and white inmates were interviewed aimed to find out “why African American inmates chose whites as their victims in a sexual assault.” [7] Four more prison studies dating to 2000, 2003, 2005 and 2012 all concluded that “black men are disproportionately involved as sexual assault aggressors.” [8] Meanwhile, some new studies have been trying to shift attention towards “black victims” instead of “black perpetrators”, similar to what is being done with murder rates. [9]
  
  Still, the numbers are so obviously stacked against blacks that even modern, extremist, “anti-racism” crusaders educated at Eastern Establishment universities as Princeton concur that the prevailance of black-on-white prison rape is “at least partially rooted in statistical reality.” This is coming from Eastern Establishment professors screaming and raging about the fact that in April 1981 a judge wouldn’t sent a slender-build, apparently gay men to the 90%-black Rikers Island prison, because he “would be immediately subject to homosexual rape and sodomy and to brutalities from fellow prisoners as make the imagination recoil in horror.” [10]
  
  Arguably the defendant deserved community service and a hefty fine to be paid to a black police officer he allowed his German Shepherd to attack. Agree or disagree, the point is, these numbers roughly correspond with those found out in society – and racial segragation in prison can prevent an incredible amount of misery, particularly for native white inmates.





• Turns out, black people consider their own ethnic group more racist against white people than white people consider themselves racist against black people. [11]


• In addition, there’s evidence that in American ghettos there’s quite a bit of hate against whites, with random attacks happening largely or purely based on skin color. [12] It has even become a trend for the New Black Panther Party and various affiliates to call for violence against whites, including the need to “kill some crackers [and] kill some of their babies.” [13]


• June 2, 2020, Wall Street Journal, ‘The Myth of Systemic Police Racism; Hold officers accountable who use excessive force. But there’s no evidence of widespread racial bias.’:
  
  
  “In 2018 there were 7,407 black homicide victims. Assuming a comparable number of victims last year, those nine unarmed black victims of police shootings represent 0.1% of all African-Americans killed in 2019. By contrast, a police officer is 18.5 times more likely to be killed by a black male than an unarmed black male is to be killed by a police officer. …
  
  “A 2015 Justice Department analysis of the Philadelphia Police Department found that white police officers were less likely than black or Hispanic officers to shoot unarmed black suspects. Research by Harvard economist Roland G. Fryer Jr. also found no evidence of racial discrimination in shootings. …
  
  “On Memorial Day weekend in Chicago alone, 10 African-Americans were killed in drive-by shootings. … Police shootings are not the reason that blacks die of homicide at eight times the rate of whites and Hispanics combined; criminal violence is.”


• The following compilation shows the 2015 study in question. Set up after the Black Lives Matter controversy, the study revealed that black police officers are twice as often involved in incorrectly shooting black suspects than their white colleagues, and that Hispanic police officers tend to do that 3x more often. In other words, there indeed is no evidence of any “white supremacy” among white police officers.

• An August 17, 2016 look at the Los Angeles Police Department’s complete Most Wanted List reveals 220 individuals. There are literally only 4 Caucasians on the list compared to 26 blacks, about 175 Hispanics and a few remaining Asians.


• Another interesting statistic, albeit of less importance, is that blacks have the highest percentage of children born out of wedlock: 72%. Hispanics follow at 53% and whites at 29%. The average in liberal north-western Europe today is about 45%, with Scandinavia having the highest average of about 52%. The remote Icelanders take second place after American blacks at 66%. (click here for European statistics)

• Looking at the latest-available welfare numbers from the Center for Immigration Studies, 55% of black households receive welfare and 23% of white households. Thus black households receive 2.4x more often welware than white ones. Cash assistance to black households is 3.1x higher than white ones. [14]

Apart from black households, it appears that immigrants of Central America in particular are taxing the United States’ already questionable welfare system. It would be nice to have additional numbers on welfare, mainly involving long-term and short-term beneficiaries. In the Netherlands, for example, only about 4% of native white people are long-term recipients while another relatively small percentage involve short-term ones. Compare this to Dutch Somalians who are 70% long-term unemployed and maybe another 10-20% that is short-term unemployed. It appears similarly high numbers go for other (Sub-Saharan) African immigrations.

It would also be interesting to have regional data, especially on America’s deep south where not only the highest black population numbers are, but also the most amount unemployment, the lowest IQs (less interbreeding with white people), and, as a result, the greatest amount of division. In addition, because crime numbers among U.S. blacks are so high, especially for robberies, it would also be interesting to see how many estimated blacks (and whites) are not on welfare due to criminal practices.

These last statistics were actually added in response to me remembering a February 2012 YouTube clip of two female students of Gainesville High School in Jacksonville, Florida. They uploaded a rant about the black people of their high school not being able to talk proper English, seldom graduating, mismanaging money by spending it on expensive name-brand clothes and other non-essential bling, committing most of the crime, and having no aspirations besides getting on welfare or working at McDonald’s.

Blacks, and the occasional Eminem fan, swarmed their YouTube video en masse to down-vote, insult their intelligence, and threaten that “they should be taught a lesson”. In any case, a handful of local newspapers, as well as first-rate “liberal CIA” outlets as the Huffington Post and The Young Turks, joined the lynching party, labeling these girls “racist” without any kind of rational debate. As a result of these girls being hung high and dry at a ratio of at least 5 to 1, they had to fear for their lives to the point of having to go into hiding, were expelled from school, and were forced to publicly apologize.

These girls weren’t racist at all. The primary one talked about her best friend, Marcel, a black guy (including another hilarious but “did she really just say that” remark: “His skin color, if it was any darker you wouldn’t be able to find him.”), while the other girl mentioned a Jamaican friend. Both these black kids also made fun of the many “niggers” amongst their race. This is just realism and how these kids talk amongst each other. The media always exploits this issue by pretending it’s not possible or logical to have opposing opinions about race and individuals within that race. It’s one of countless tactics used to sell us the multicultural non-society.

So, should these girls have made their video the way that they did? Maybe, maybe not. Their honesty certainly is very refreshing, considering the majority of whites have these opinions, certainly the ones who have been in contact with black ghettos and Third World immigration – whether they like to admit it or not. But factual discussions involving statistics really would be better for public discourse. It’s better at keeping the peace and it makes it infinitely harder for the media to attack the messenger. At that point, linking to you also means linking to facts establishments prefer to suppress. Thus… I invite the entire world to try and debunk this article or attack me as a person. Let’s see if you can make me back down and apologize.

Crime numbers on U.K. blacks

• A study of The Independent from 2006 to 2009 revealed that roughly 72% of gang rape convicts in London in this period were black or mixed, 14% were white, and 13% were Arab. [15]
  
  At that point the white population in London stood at about 70%, the black population at about 11% and the Arab nationalities listed at no more than 4%.
  
  Based on these numbers, and from the original source, it can be concluded that London blacks are roughly 32x more often involved in gang rape incidents than whites. And Arabs at least 17x.
  
  Of course, reports starting in 2014 of a “Muslim rape crisis” could have easily been predicted. Also keep in mind that many Africans pouring into Europe, such as the Somalians, also are Muslim. Sub-Sahara Africa has a HUGE institutional rape problem while Arabs tend to be highly sexually frustrated due to their religion.


• Data for 2009-2010 of the Metropolitan Police reveals that 54% of “street crimes” (theft, fighting and such), 59% of robberies and 67% of gun crimes in London were perpetrated by blacks. At that point in time about 12% of London was black or mixed and 69% white, a ratio of 1 to 5.75. If you’re estimating an 18% white crime rate with all three listed offenses, you’re looking at black crime levels in London – involving serious crime – that are 15 to 20x higher than white.
  
  From that perspective, the statement of the media that “police figures also show that black men are twice as likely to be victims” is suspect, because did they correct these numbers with the demographic percentages? If not, this statement would come down to a lie. And how much of this number involves black-on-black crime? As usual, the public is kept in the dark.
  
  Media reports on these numbers also noted that black women also are strongly overrepresented in violent crime.
  
  Also interesting is the remark that “on sex offences, black men made up 32 per cent of male suspects proceeded against, and white men 49 per cent.” Even when corrected for demographic percentages, that number appears to be a little high for white people. Maybe they should have singled out “gang rape” instead of the very vague term “sex offences”.
  
  Also expected is the citation of an official who explains that “Britain’s long history of racism and imperialism” is responsible for the high crime numbers among London blacks. [16]

Crime numbers on Dutch blacks

• Also in the Netherlands there is a long history of suppressing immigrant crime numbers. One example is a prominent 2010 study based on police records in which it was claimed that immigrant groups as Turks, Moroccans, Antilleans and Surinams on average have 2 to 2.5x the crime numbers of Dutch white natives. [17] To anyone with a pair of eyeballs who lives in the big city, this simply doesn’t make any sense. One obvious weakness of the study was that it didn’t look at the type of crimes committed or repeat offenders (there’s a big difference between tax evasion and group rape in the streets). So let’s look at some other numbers, as far as they are available or can be deduced.


• A 2008 study based on police data published by Amsterdam University Press that uses the exact same method of looking at all types of crime per ethnicity per 10,000 already gives us: Moroccans: 3.7x overrepresented, (45% black) Surinams: 3.5x and (85% black) Antilleans: 5x. As expected, Far East Asians at 1.1x and other West-Europeans at 1.2x have much lower crime numbers, making immigration from these areas considerably less of an ordeal. Most surprisingly is the relatively low number of 2.5x crime overrepresentation for Turkey, the Middle East and Africa (the latter of which there weren’t many in 2008).
  
  Luckily, the same report also focuses on sex crimes, singling out, among other things, sexual assault and full-on rape. All of a sudden we see MUCH higher representation among Arabs and Black Africans compared to Westerners and Asians. We also see the familiar pattern of Arabs sticking to sexual assault while blacks are hugely overrepresented in the most violent category: rape. The numbers are even worse than seen here, because, as reported on page 117 of this report, group assault and group rape out there in clubs and on the street is only done by Arabs and blacks. And the report doesn’t mention the primary victim group: white girls.

Quite disconcerting with these numbers is that back in 2013 it was reported in the Dutch media that only 11 percent of vice crimes are reported to the police and 3 percent of rapes lead to the actual filing of charges, with the vice crimes squad actively discouraging victims to file charges to prevent additional trauma. In 2012 there were 1297 rape victims who went on to press charges (3-4 per day), meaning there were an estimated 43,233 rape cases overall (118 per day). [18]

Wouldn’t it be fascinating to have a look at the raw reports of all these cases and get a glimpse of what actually is going on in our society? Because, judging from the media, rape is extremely rare. Maybe 1 or 2 times a year a street assault is reported, usually without mentioning ethnicities. Although, in August 2018 such an apparently rare combined rape plus manslaughter was reported, with the media being very adament to report that the victim involved an “international student from Indonesia” even though “the police … can’t confirm this information for privacy reasons.” [19] Meanwhile, the media, and probably the police, as usual, were fully silent on the ethnicity of the perpetrator. Mind you, most people overlook that Indonesia is 87% Muslim.

• In the Netherlands, in 2013, the total number of prisoners was 42,470. Of this number, 62.8% was foreign. Apart from Moroccans (10.6%) and Turks (4.9%), half-black people from Surinam (9.7%) and almost fully-black from the Antilles (8.3%), all traditional immigration groups, make up large numbers. [20]
  
  Let’s see if we can distill more relevant data from that. The Netherlands counts 16 million inhabitants. Of these, around 2013, roughly 13,300,000 were native white (83%), 141,000 were Antilleans (0.88%), 340,000 were Surinams (2.1% – 25% of all Surinams live in the Netherlands), 370,000 were Moroccans (2.3%) and 395,000 were Turks (2.5%).
  
  That gives us the following data for 2013, which – once again – most Dutch natives will find much more recognizable than the official, widely disseminated numbers of 2 to 2.5x:

• Data from the Netherlands reveals that Antilleans and Surinams, the two most dominant black groups in the Netherlands, are four times more often a single parent than native whites. In addition, only 1 in 4 Antilleans – by the far the most black group – are living together and only 1 in 3 Surinams compared to 2 in 3 Dutch people. After repeatedly observing the almost total and complete lack of family structure among blacks (noted below), I personally was rather relieved to come across this statistic. Once again this issue is not something that is discussed in the national media.
  
  Native white Dutch have a decent amount of singles, only slightly more than Arab Muslim groups (who have a ton of arranged marriages, with women having few rights), but at the same time they are the least likely of any group to be a single parent. In other words, it appears they are doing much better than all immigrant groups.

• Living in one of the (now) immigrant-dominated districts in Rotterdam, over the years I’ve gotten used to seeing African and Caribbean blacks:
  
  
  • hang out in large groups of adult men on street corners during the day and night;
  • buy stuff at (much more expensive) night stores en masse, even though they have no money;
  • not display any kind of traditional family structure;
  • have children that, more than any other ethnicity, have trouble focusing in school, with both boys and girls (very unruly and unusually unsupportive towards each other, also when compared to white or Asian children of similarly low socio-economic status);
  • have children that often do not respect white authority, whether white stepmothers (neighbor’s black 13-year-old kid calls his white stepmom (black father left) a “cancer whore”, physically attacks her, and regularly tells her he’ll kill her) or people in the street trying to correct their behavior;
  • have children that gang up on white kids in the street out of racist motives;
  • eat extensive meals while sitting in public transportation (forbidden), only to open the door or window to dump their left-overs onto the street;
  • smoke weed in public transportation, mainly the metro, stinking up the entire wagon;
  • loudly converse about sexual acts at pavement cafes or restaurants;
  • keep 100 families awake all night with garden parties, with the police too overworked and demotivated to even show up after 8+ hours of this;
  • structurally (and loudly) converse through open windows all hours of the day and night without bothering to use doors – or even install doorbells.
  • scream and yell as loud at 3 o’clock at night as they do at 3 o’clock in the afternoon;
  • harass random attractive (white) women – as young as 14 years old – who go over street without male company and with whom they stand no chance;
  • very visibly lick their lips at random attractive (white) girls;
  • blast their African/Caribbean gangster rap on their phones in crowded places, even in public transportation, similar to the old school boomboxes (now native teenagers are also starting to do it everywhere);
  • continually blast gangster rap from their cars with giant subwoofers and open windows, to the point you often hear the music at 50 decibels inside your well-isolated home (you seldom hear Dutch, heavy metal, or “normal” music – only gangster rap, Islamo-Dutch rap, or reggaeton);
  • use curse words to each other while employed in stores and surrounded by customers;
  • ignore green lights with 10 cars behind them waiting, because they’re talking to a friend in the street.


• Now, do I feel bad for black persons who behave? Maybe I do, maybe I don’t. It’s not relevant. Statistics and daily observations, which also can be turned into statistical data, are.

Sweden’s “rape crisis”: Blacks, Arabs, Latinos

“Swedes have to be integrated into the new Sweden. The old Sweden isn’t coming back. … I can’t figure out what Swedish culture is. I think that’s sort of what makes so many Swedes jealous of immigrants. You have a culture, an identity, a history, something that binds you together. And what do we have? We have midsummers eve and “dorky” things like that.”

This article is primarily about presenting neutral, statistical information that cannot be discredited; personal experiences and individual cases are purposely limited. In case of Sweden, this is hard to do. A number of important statistics are available on this country, and these will be discussed at the end, but there also exists quite a bit of questionable information online about a number prominent rape cases in Sweden that needs to be countered somewhere. This article happens to be the best venue to do that, even more so because all these rape cases involve black Somali and Ethiopian perpetrators. For the most part, Somalis and Ethiopians are both black and Muslim, providing western civilization with the best of both worlds. Measured IQs in these countries average around 65.

In August 2016, I ran into statistics pushed by U.S. conservatives, including the neocon Gatestone Institute of former CIA director James Woolsey, showing vastly increased rape numbers in Sweden from 2005 and on. Of course, what these conservatives didn’t tell their audiences is that Sweden widened its definition of rape in 2005, which came to include anyone victimized while under the influence of alcohol, drugs, or in an otherwise vulnerable state. Considering the immediate vertical rise of rapes in Sweden, it can safely be determined that this legislation had something to do with it. In 2008 and 2013 the definition of rape in Sweden was further expanded. A graph of the number of rapes in Sweden can be found below. The heading translates as “Attempted and actual rape”:

Is this all there is to Sweden’s “rape epidemic”? No, not exactly. The above graph reveals that the number of rapes in the Sweden increased roughly 600% between 1975 and 2004 and grew pretty darn steadily with the number of “guest workers” arriving in the country. Sweden accepted these immigrants earlier and in larger quantities than any other European country. It has also been a favorite destination of immigrants, because it’s the only place in Europe where someone on social security could get a three bedroom apartment, at least until the recent past. In other words, it’s not particularly unusual to see that crime in Sweden has increased the most among European countries. As already established in other sections of this article, Third World immigrants, and blacks in particular, bring with them huge increases in crime.

Unfortunately, with these little lies of omission, conservatives are actually aiding the liberals in covering up the immigrant crime problem in a very Machiavellian manner. Like clockwork, President Donald Trump did his part in February 2017 when at some point during a speech he stated:

Check your facts, man. Nothing happened in Sweden that “last night”, something the entire media gratefully made use of by painting Trump as a rambling, xenophobic schizophrenic. However, this is just the right-wing being the right-wing: they push endless streams of disinformation and fake news, whether that’s about the Kennedy assassination, or 9/11, or now, apparently, also with Third World immigration even. Certainly they can and should do a much better job of gathering, organizing and publishing global immigrant crime statistics. The fact that Woolsey served as an advisor to the Trump campaign probably is no coincidence, nor the fact that Trump associates with top conspiracy disinformer Alex Jones, or that both Trump and Jones tie all the way back to Barry Goldwater and the John Birch Society. None of the public’s “favorite” anti-immigration political candidates have been or are independent: Donald Trump, Nigel Farage, Pim Fortuyn, Geert Wilders, the Le Pen family, etc. They all have questionable ties and/or display peculiar self-sabotaging behavior.

The same conservative manipulation can be spotted in a number of relatively prominent rape cases in Sweden involving native girls and immigrant men. Whoever types in “Swedish rape numbers” in a search engine or something along these lines will be confronted with a number of images that really are only pushed by Nazi, ultraconservative, and a handful of pro-Israel neoconservative sites – many of them exclusively in Swedish. Because the cases attached to these images are extremely obscure, with much of the information being poorly sourced, incomplete, untranslated, or blatantly incorrect, it might help to discuss here what these cases were about. While this article doesn’t focus much on individual cases, stopping misinformation and disinformation is seldom a bad idea.

A first picture / meme that regularly comes up anno 2017 – if only because it is listed on the Snopes.com website – is one of a beautiful, young, blond, Swedish girl who claims to have been kidnapped and gang-raped for 17 hours by three refugees. The quote attributed to her includes, “The police said the assault was my fault and the judge sentenced them all to probation. … This took place last year, when I was 14.” The girl’s name isn’t provided with the meme, nor any kind of source, so it’s not surprising to find out the whole case was made up. Fact check / debunking site Snopes.com dove on it like a vampire and exposed the image as a hoax in an article entitled Swedish Girl Refugee Assault Meme, concluding it represents “a creative illustration of its creator’s fear of refugees in Europe.” Always the same buzzwords: “hate”, “fear”, etc.

The Snopes article was written by Snopes.com author Kim LaCapria. A quick check on her Twitter reveals recent links to such articles as The Atlantic’s The Normalization of Conspiracy Culture: People who share dangerous ideas don’t necessarily believe them, which, of course, pretends Alex Jones and other conspiracy-inventing disinformers are not simply CIA assets. Despite being in the unique position to be self-reliant, Snopes is deeply involved in the “liberal CIA” network of George Soros and other foundations which spent tens of millions per year at least on pro-Third World immigration propaganda. Fact is, without also pointing people into the right direction on subjects as immigration, they’re doing more damage than good. Of course, doing damage to credible-but-sensitive facts is exactly what they’re after. This site is not going to be discouraged though after the debunking of one fake photo.

A second picture that is easily found online involves the bloodied up face of a certain 18-year-old Linda. She’s visible on the right. As it turns out, she and her friend Jenny Lemon, the one in the smaller picture, were assaulted by four Somali teens on New Year’s Eve 2004/2005. They were on their way to a party in Stockholm, got lost, and then decided it would be a wise idea to follow this group of four Somali teens who claimed they knew where the party was. The second they entered a quiet area, the group hit the girls over the head with batons and dragged them off to the bushes. Linda pretended to be dead. This worked and thus only her friend Jenny was gang-raped naked on the ice cold winter ground by the men. After they were done, she was kicked in the stomach, but left alive. A glass bottle had shattered her eye socket. Both girls were robbed of their mobile phones and other belongings.

DNA of one of the men was found inside Jenny and thus it was not too hard to apprehend the perpetrators and get them convicted. Lawyers of the defendants trying to make the case that she was drunk and had imagined things remain a little disturbing. [21]

Apparently both girls went on national television in 2005 and, with the encouragement of the national media, explained that this crime – of course! – had nothing to do with immigration, color of skin, culture, or anything else. In August 2010 Jenny even wrote an article for Expressen.se, one of two major tabloids in Sweden, in which she claimed the same thing. Jenny’s words:

While it’s not exactly fun to start an argument with someone who has been through her ordeal, Jenny allowed herself here to be used by Sweden’s political and business establishment surrounding Bilderberg as a pro-Third World immigration tool. True, she hardly was given a choice. Generally both the conservative right and the liberal left manipulate any Third World immigration discussions and it’s highly, highly unlikely that Expressen.se, pro-immigration (and anti-Trump) as it is, would have allowed her to write that article if she would have taken any stance even remotely critical of Third World immigration. The fact is, as this article demonstrates, African blacks in particular have vastly higher gang rape, murder and robbery numbers than native white populations. They’re even higher than with Muslim Arabs, although in this case, the perpetrators are both.

Somewhat predictably, the man who raped Jenny (the others held her) was arrested again in November 2011 under a new name on charges that he had broken into the home of an 84-year-old woman and raped her. [23] In other words, he was out very quickly, he was never deported, and he didn’t change his ways at all.

Immediately above another set of images can be found, the one on the right in particular is popping up a lot in Google when searching for keywords involving “Sweden”, “rape” and “statistics”. The woman in these pictures used to be the 27-year-old Elin Krantz. On September 27, 2010 she was followed out of a Swedish tram by the 23-year-old Ephrem Yohannes, an ethnic Somalian who used to live in the United States, where he compiled a significant criminal record, and then came to Sweden. After leaving the tram with her, Yohannes proceeded to rape and murder Krantz in a nearby park. While raping her, he called one of his friends, apparently in an effort to brag about the great time he was having – and maybe to ask him to come over. On the retrieved voicemail message, Krantz can be heard whimpering, with some reports mentioning that a second male voice was heard on the (deleted) recording. [24] Nevertheless, only Yohannes was tried and convicted, receiving a 16-year prison sentence. [25] With a little luck, he’ll be out in his mid 30s, plenty young and healthy enough to make another victim. Initially I couldn’t wrap my mind about the idea of Yohannes actually calling up a buddy while raping and murdering a woman. That was until I compiled rape statistics for Africa. Those explain quite a bit.

Bizarrely, in the years prior to her death, Krantz was a member of the Facebook group “Vi Gillar Olika” (“We Like Diversity”), promoting Third World immigration into Sweden. While apparently maintaining sexual relations with men of immigrant backgrounds, the “alternative media” claim that she starred in a provocative “Mix it Up” (“Blanda Upp”) video, in which she supposedly is singing the Swedish national anthem while riding a black guy, isn’t true. As already observed here and there, clips of the video clearly show a different blond woman. The “Mix it Up” video by itself is utterly bizarre though and a product of Sweden’s pro-Bilderberg establishment.

In recent years another picture has been showing up in relation to Swedish rape victims, in this case tied to the October 27, 2010 anal rape and murder of a woman by Swedish-Somali immigrant named Abdi Hakim Ali. The incident took place on the floor of a parking garage underneath the Sheraton Hotel in Vasagatan, Stockholm. Allegedly Ali found the woman – under the influence of alcohol, cocaine and barbiturates and possibly sick with pneumonia – on the floor here and decided it would be perfectly normal and great fun to stick his dick in her ass; more so than calling the authorities or taking care of the woman in a more conventional manner. One wonders how life-threatening her situation really was before Ali found her, but she died during the rape. This didn’t impress Ali too much, as he continued to pound her lifeless body until the police could arrest him.

According to the phone call that went to the police informing them about this rape in a parking lot, two men were involved in the process. Pictures or video of the crime scene also reveal the presence of a second man. A second man indeed was arrested, but somehow not enough evidence could be found against this person to tie him to the rape and death of the woman.

The authorities decided against prosecuting Ali for murder, because there were “no signs of external violence” and thus in their eyes it couldn’t be proved that he had actually caused the woman’s death. [26] One wonders if she would be dead today if Ali had just called an ambulance or even simply had let her be. The stress of a 20-minute, involuntary, painful ass-pounding can easily send a very sick woman over the edge, right into her grave. Ali’s testimony that the woman had consented to sex luckily were dismissed, and eventually he was sentenced to “five years in prison for rape, theft, aggravated theft, attempted theft, shoplifting and violation of knife law.” Apparently charges along the lines of Manslaughter or Wrongful Death didn’t stick either. In addition, after a little too much media criticism, the prosecutor decided that all of a sudden it would be legally possible to deport Ali, albeit for no more than 10 years. [27] With sentences like these, one wonders if Ali has made his last rape or murder victim. In case of Ali, it was soon found out that just two months before his arrest of raping the supposedly unconscious woman, he had anally raped a sleeping homeless man in a night shelter. [28]

Apart from these three cases – Linda and Jenny in 2004, Elin Krantz in 2010 and the victim of Abdi Hakim Ali in 2013 – no pictures of alleged Swedish rape victims appear to be spreading across the propagandist and fake news-dominated underbelly of the internet.

Other news reports of violent immigrant gang rapes in Sweden do exist. One example would be a June 19, 2014 case in which three young Iranians kidnapped and raped a girl. In the process they damaged the girl’s vagina by using a gun to rape her that way as well. Eventually she managed to escape and was found by her father, who was looking for her. The perpetrators were convicted from 14 months to 5 years, meaning at least two are already back on the street. [29] April 2017 saw the strangulation and gang rape of a 15-year-old Swedish girl by three Africans in the 19 to 20-year-old range, one from Somalia, one from Sierra Leone and another from an unknown country. The men argued it was the fault of the girl, because she shouldn’t have been spending the night alone at an apartment with men around. [30] Another case that should be mentioned is the one of Somalian Ibrahim Ahmed Dahir, who in December 2014 unbelievably violently beat (with a glass bottle) and raped in every possible way a Swedish woman who demanded he give back her stolen bicycle. Dahir had been convicted for rape a few years before as well, but could not be expelled “because he was a Swedish citizen.” [31] As I find the original report on Friatider.se, I also spot new stories in the right column involving “youngsters” having tried to gang rape a 50-year-old woman before being scared off and “a bunch of older guys on mopeds” battering an 8-year-old girl and threatening to kill her. No nationalities are mentioned. Sweden is such a safe, wonderful place these days.

Unfortunately, in many, if not the vast majority of cases, the ethnic background of the perpetrators is left out of the media. Apart from a tiny handful of exceptions, neither national nor international media outlets take had an interest in reporting on these stories. In addition, for many years at this point the Swedish government has refused to publish any statistical data that reveal these numbers. In January 2016, coincidentally two weeks after the prominent New Year’s Eve immigrant rape epidemic in Germany [32], the Swedish government even banned its police services from providing any details to the media on the ethnic background of suspects. [33]

Luckily, it is possible to find an old study of the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (BRA) that looked at statistical crime differences between native Swedes, immigrants, and sometimes also the children of immigrants. The data goes all the way back to 1985-1989. The result were as follows:

Tellingly, rape scores the highest among immigrant crime numbers, followed by other major, often violent, crimes. The only thing stunning about the above statistics is that immigrants in that period in Sweden only produced on average 4 times the heavy crime numbers. If you look at more modern prison population numbers from the Netherlands, we find 5.5x, 7.6x, 10x and 21x, respectively for Turks, Moroccans, Surinams and Antilleans. It makes one wonder with this old Swedish study. Obviously crime numbers need to be listed per nationality or at the very least per cultural region to gain any kind of serious insights.

Turns out, due to the Swedish language, I missed a few aspects of the report. According to a 2015 Asia Times article describing this report:

To be honest, while vastly higher than the 4.5x mentioned earlier in the report (which might include Far East Asians and Europeans from other countries), these numbers still look a little on the low side here and there, at least for Sub-Saharan Africa. The explanation for this might lie in the fact that very few men from southern Africa, where the rape crisis appears to be the worst (on the planet), make their voyage to Europe. It’s hard to say.

The Asia Times article also talked about a second – and for now final – study on immigrant crime carried out in Sweden:

Remember the study of The Independent in London in the 2006-2009 period which concluded that 72% of gang rapists were black or mixed, 13% were Arab, with remaining 14% being white? That means Blacks and Arabs committed 85% of the gang rapes, which is very similar to the 85% immigrant rape number (apparently all rape) in Sweden just a few years earlier.

About 12% of Sweden’s population was immigrant in 2012, so 5.67x higher rape crime rate, corrected for a 7.3x smaller immigrant population would mean a rape rate among Swedish immigrants that is 42x higher than native white Swedes. The overwhelming majority of these can be credited to blacks and Arabs. True, I’m not a mathematician and my math can easily be off, but even when we divide this by half the numbers are pretty much apocalyptic.

Unfortunately, the Asia Times article was written by economist David P. Goldman, a person who used to be an economic analyst for peculiar conspiracy promoter Lyndon LaRouche and his Executive Intelligence Review magazine. Granted, Goldman later also worked for the Reagan administration, Credit Suisse, Bank of America, was published by the Wall Street Journal and Bloomberg Businessweek, and served as a columnist for Forbes from 1994 to 2001. It remains telling, however, that the writing of such a unique and important article has been delegated, once again, to a rather curious individual. It also makes one wonder why Goldman accepts the earlier-mentioned neocon Gatestone Institute as a credible source and why he doesn’t explain that Sweden adapted its definition of rape in 2005. Gatestone certainly was six months earlier in describing these studies, so Goldman basically served as a conservative echo-chamber.

While trying to find an original copy of the study of Ann-Christine Hjelm [36], I ran into a very extensive January 11, 2017 rape report compiled by the nationalist Swedish Democrats party. [37] Based on no less than 32 very underreported studies into rape and immigration, it discusses the study of Ann-Christine Hjelm and then some. The study of Hjelm is discussed on page 10 of the report:

For a minute there I began to wonder if maybe Woolsey’s Gatestone Institute and David Goldman had confused Hjelm’s report based on 2002 numbers with the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention based on 1985-1989 numbers. This turned out not to be the case. On page 20 we find the latter study discussed:

In other words, in the 1985-1989 period:

• 1 in 500 Swedes was suspected of rape, while:
• 1 in 22 North Africans was suspected of the same crime;
• 1 in 25 Iraqis;
• 1 in 28 Bulgarians and Romanians;
• 1 in 30 Sub-Saharan Africans;
• 1 in 50 Iranians and also:
• 1 in 50 Latin Americans.

The Swedish Democrats report lists a number of other interesting studies. On page 8 a 1991 study is mentioned that concluded that already back in 1982 50% of all rapists in Sweden were foreigners. At this point only a tiny fraction of Swedish society consisted of Arab and African immigrants. Then, on page 9, we find a study very similar to a Dutch report in 2001 that quoted Arab and African immigrants as saying “The white meat is available”:

Of course, Hjelm in 2006 put this number at 85%, because only 15% of rape convicts in Sweden actually were Swedish. Ceccato appears to have excluded West-European immigrants and possibly also East-European ones. What you really want to know though is how often each ethnicity is groping and raping kids, girls and women at parks, back-alleys and swimming pools when parents, friends, boyfriends and husbands aren’t looking – including cases of gang-molesting and raping. Percentages for Arabs and Africans that may stand at a combined 50 to 70% for all rape cases may well go up to 90% or more if you look at this last statistic. The numbers that we have until here, however, are still a pretty good indication, however.

Some of the other studies that are listed in the Swedish Democrats’ report draw somewhat more mild conclusions, providing overrepresentation of immigrants among rape cases as low as between 1.5 to 5 times. They remind one of widely-published conclusions in the Netherlands “revealing” that black and Arab immigrants only are 2 to 2.5 times more often involved in crime than natives. Than, when you look deeper and do your own math, you find out that these groups can be found in jail 5 to more than 20 times more often – which is making a lot more sense. Picking flowers where you’re not supposed to and a murderous gang-rape shouldn’t fall in the same category, but that’s exactly what was done with this prominent Dutch study. So who really knows about the reliability of some of the other Swedish studies.

For the rest, the situation in Sweden surrounding Third World immigrants is very remiscant of the Netherlands and other European countries. In a very balanced article of the National Review, which actually criticized the Washington Post for writing the bold-faced lie that “by and large, integration has been a success story [in Sweden]” wrote:

Norway’s “rape crisis”: Blacks and Arabs

This section was only added months after the Swedish one was finished, and only after a lot of digging through Norwegian news articles and police report. By far the most telling statistics are included on pages 19 and 20 in an obscure April 2008 Oslo police report entitled Voldtekt i Oslo 2007 (Rape in Oslo 2007). These statistics are unique and important for a number of reasons. First, they demonstrate how in just 6 years Africans grew from 10% of the total number of rapes in the capital to a whopping 31%, with a corresponding percentual decline in ethnic Norwegians. Secondly, the report – rather uniquely – spells out the exact countries from which the largest number of rapists come from. They are all the usual suspects, including recently arrived black Somalians and Gambians.

Keep in mind, Afghanistan and Pakistan fall under “Asia” while Morocco and Egypt fall under “Africa”. Another thing to keep in mind is that even by 2014 only 35,000 Somalis were in the country on a population of just over 5 million (0.7%) and with that formed the third largest immigrant group, far behind the Poles and Swedes who don’t show up in these statistics.

Later, somewhat less controversial Oslo police statistics additionally reveal a clear and continuing uptrend in annual rape numbers, all of it coinciding with the number of Third World immigrants arriving in Norway.

About 95% of violent street assaults and rape in Norway are carried out by blacks and Arabs. In contrast, roughly 70 to 80 percent of Norwegian rape victims are ethnic Norwegians. Thus it’s no wonder that people here have been talking about a “rape crisis” since the turn of the century or so.

More information about Norway will be added in the future.

Crime numbers on Australian Aboriginals

• It turns out to be next to impossible to find crime numbers on Aboriginals. Generally one can only find incarceration rates. That’s unfortunate, because this can spun by extremists into being the result of racial profiling, despite the fact everyone in Australia is aware of the Aboriginal problem around train stations or tourist places as Alice Springs.


• August 2006, Medical Journal of Australia, ‘Aboriginal incarceration: health and social impacts’: “Aboriginal prisoners currently represent 22% of the total Australian prisoner population. … Although Australian incarceration rates overall are similar to rates in other industrialised nations, averaging 163 per 100,000 adult population in 2005, national age-standardised rates for Aboriginal prisoners of 1561 per 100,000 are at an unacceptable level and rising.”


• August 2006, Medical Journal of Australia, ‘Aboriginal incarceration: health and social impacts’: “A recent study in NSW showed that nearly half of all the young people in juvenile justice custody, 42% of whom are Aboriginal, have a history of a parent in prison.”


• April 19, 2016, CCTV News, Asia Today, Greg Navarro from Sidney, YouTube title of CCTV: ‘Aboriginal Australians: Aboriginals’ high crime rate disproportionate’: “Well, I got to go back to that statistic you just gave, where you said they account for about 25% of the indigenous population incarcerated or in prison. What is even more startling about that is that indigenous Australians make up about 3% [2.7%] of the entire population here.”


• With an Australian prison population of 38,845 – with a max of 9,711 Aboriginals – and officially 606,164 Aboriginals in the country in 2016, that would come down to 1.6% of the entire Aboriginal population in jail at any one time. If we look to the Netherlands, Aboriginals sit between Surinams (1.2%) and the notorious Antilleans (2.5%) in terms of crime levels.


• August 2006, Medical Journal of Australia, ‘Aboriginal incarceration: health and social impacts’: “In SA, close to 60% of metropolitan Aboriginal prisoners are positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibodies.” To compare, the rate here in the Netherlands, even with large numbers of immigrants, sits at 0.2%.

Crime numbers on Brazilian blacks

• June 5, 2015, Buenos Aires Herald, ‘Young black men dominate Brazil’s crowded prisons’: “With respect to the race, for white citizens, there are 191 inmates every 100,000 in 2012, while for blacks, there are 292 inmates for every 100,000.”

Keep in mind here that Mestizos, mixes of white and American Indian genes that are to be found all over Latin America, are considered “white”. Generally, the more Native American in descent, the higher the crime numbers.

Overall, media reports on crime in Brazil only talk about “black victims”, clearly insinuating that police repression is a significant, or even dominant factor, in black crime in Brazil. This position is questionable at best.

Apparently 61% of all rape victims in Brazil are black women [39], which would be interesting considering only 7.8% of Brazilians classify as “Afro-Brazilians” and, looking at the United States, most crime tends to be black-on-black. So unless white and brown races en masse seek out black women to rape, rape culture also permeates Brazilian black society.

However, Brazil, which in addition consists of 62.5% “brown” inhabitants (so about 70% black and brown), overall has a huge institutional gang rape problem. Rape and gang rape of women is seen as relatively normal. A 2016 case in which 33 men of mixed black, brown and white descent raped a 16-year-old girl before posting a video of it on Twitter is good example of this, as are comments by prominent actors and politicians that in the West would have immediately ended their career but in Brazil hardly made a dent in their popularity. [40]

Sub-Saharan Africa: the cradle of gang rape non-civilization

• Overall, Latin American countries high in American Indian genes and black-dominated countries have the highest homicide rates in the world. However, Sub-Saharan Africa deserves special mention for its institutional rape culture. South Africa is the worst, but many countries in this region are not far behind. Not only are vast amounts of women raped and gang raped, it will often also lead to ostracization from the community. Even husbands will throw wives out onto the street if they find out they were raped. Speaking of husbands, in much of Africa they rape their wives all the time. Women are not allowed to protest, even when their husbands are HIV positive. As in Muslim countries, women simply have nothing to say.


• June 18, 2009, BBC, ‘South African rape survey shock’: “One in four [27.6%] South African men questioned in a survey said they had raped someone, and nearly half of them admitted more than one attack. The study, by the country’s Medical Research Council, also found three out of four who admitted rape had attacked for the first time during their teens. It said practices such as gang rape were common because they were considered a form of male bonding.”


• September 27, 2013, Zimbabwe Independent, ‘Rape is an African problem’: “South Africa’s Medical Research Council in 2009 which found that more than a quarter of South African men — 27,6% – admitted that they had committed rape. Almost half of those men had raped two or three women or girls. One in 13 had raped at least 10 victims. …
  The researchers chose six countries in the Asia-Pacific region: China, Cambodia, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea. … In most of the Asian countries involved in the study, between 2 and 4% of the men interviewed said that they had raped a “non-partner” woman. That falls into the same range that prevails, one suspects, in most developed countries (although their reported cases of rape are much lower). … [Only] Papua New Guinea [with coincidentally very Africa-looking natives] was right up there with South Africa: 26,6% of the men interviewed had committed “single perpetrator rape” of a non-partner woman.”


• May 12, 2016, Washington Post (super pro-establishment and thus anti-“racism”), ‘Rape is black people’s ‘pastime,’ white South African judge says in Facebook rant’ (Facebook comments in article reproduced here):







• July 4, 2013 (original apparently dates to 2000), Bomme Isago Association, ‘Rape in Botswana: A National Shame’: “In South Africa a woman is raped every 35 seconds and one in two women will be raped in their lifetime. … Police in South Africa have estimated that only one in 35 rapes is reported. …
  Women in Botswana are beaten and raped by their male partners on a daily, if not hourly basis. … About 60 percent of Botswana women have been a victim of gender violence in the last five years, a quarter have been multiple sufferers. … Rape crisis counselors in Botswana believe that even fewer rapes are reported as many prefer to keep the crime a “family matter”, so in fact this figure is likely to be much higher. … In 1982 only 23 percent of reported rapes ended in a conviction. In 1997 this had fallen still further to 20 percent. …
  In the recent Women’s Affairs survey 37 percent of interviewees had suffered a severe beating 1-5 times in 1998 at the hands of their male partner.”


• May 22, 2002, Afrol News, ‘Rape “a massive problem for Namibia“‘: “As many as 15,000 people a year [in a country with only about a million women] could however be victims of rape or attempted rape because it is believed that that only about one in every 20 rapes is actually reported to the Police.”


• July 4, 2016, CAJNewsAfrica.com, ‘Zambia: Domestic Violence, Rape Worryingly High in Zambia’: “It is reported 31 percent of girls and 30 percent of boys aged 13-15 in Zambia have been forced to have sex.
  In another survey, 25 percent of women and 16 percent of men in Zambia reported they had intercourse before the legal age of 18 because they were threatened or forced.
  Zambia has one of the highest rates of child marriage in the world. Nearly one-fifth (17 percent) of girls in Zambia age 15-19 are married, and 65 percent are married by age 20.”





• May 6, 2015, Reuters, ‘Uganda‘s women, girls seek justice to halt sexual violence: rights group’: “Rape is the first sexual experience of almost a quarter of Ugandan women aged 15-49, and 39 percent of women in this age group have been subjected to sexual violence, according to Uganda’s 2006 Demographic and Health Survey. … “families tend to keep quiet either to protect their supposed honor…””


• 2010, Caryn Neumann, ‘Sexual Crime: A Reference Handbook’, p. 78: “HIV infection in Zimbabwe has reached endemic proportions, with infection estimates ranging from 25 to 33 percent. A woman who cannot say “no” to sex [which they can’t] cannot refuse sex with her HIV-infected husband. The World Alliance of YMCAs has reported that 73 percent of Zimbabwean women report being forced to have sex with their partners with 69 percent of these women engaging in sexual relations with a man that they knew to be infected with a sexually transmitted disease.”


• November 9, 2009, The Guardian, ‘Child rape epidemic in Zimbabwe’: “A single clinic in the capital, Harare, says it has treated nearly 30,000 girls and boys who were abused in the past four years [on a population of 13 million] – an average of 20 per day. … The GCN’s research indicates that on average a man can rape 250 children before his crimes become public knowledge.”


• July 18, 2014, IRINNews.org, ‘Tackling Liberia’s high rape rate’: “Sexual violence against women is down from a high of 77 percent during wartime… Survey data from 2013 found that 19-26 percent of women and girls have reported having been raped by a stranger, and that 70-73 percent of married women have been sexually assaulted by their husbands… Many rape survivors are shunned by their family and may never marry. Others are forced to marry their rapist, as they are considered “damaged goods”.”


• December 27, 2016, Daily Beast, ‘Boko Haram Teaching Child Soldiers to Rape’: “Nigeria – … The young boys, most of whom were about Ahmed’s age, watched as their commanders raped women and young girls abducted in earlier raids. The lesson for the boys was clear: They were learning to subdue a struggling victim during sexual assault. …
  A report by Human Rights Watch (HRW) released in October detailed how women and girls who survived Boko Haram violence were [subsequently also] raped by officials at camps in northern Nigeria where they sought refuge. … Many of these victims said they were abandoned after becoming pregnant.””

Genetic IQ issues

Evidence that black people do not exactly make the best citizens in western society actually extends beyond crime numbers and moves into something even more controversial and suppressed: black genetic IQ numbers, in particular with blacks that carry no white, Arab, or Asian genes.

Again, to me personally seeing these numbers and other evidence related to genetic IQ was an incredible relief really. All of a sudden, so much of the behavior of newly-arrived Caribbean and African blacks – which we’re not supposed to talk about – began to make sense. Guess the masses are not delusional after all.

Do keep in mind, with the white-black IQ gap, we’re primarily talking about reasoning and intellectual capacities; not about working memory or processing speed. In other words, black people are lacking the “nerd” capacities the white and Asian races have.

While it’s entirely reasonable to be skeptical of this IQ gap, it is a fact that this gap exists, no matter what causes someone wants to attribute to it. It most certainly also explains a lot of the primitive interests and obsessions – sex, bling, partying, dancing, forming gangs – of many black people at the expense of just about anything else. It certainly explains why Africans (and the genetically related Aboriginals) are the only ones to have never developed any type of civilization beyond tribalism – or architecture beyond wooden huts. It explains why black people have never been able to acquire a Nobel prize for the sciences (not counting one in economics). It partly explains why they are so extremely underrepresented in the IT sector. [41] It explains the gigantic (gang) rape crisis of Africa and among immigrants who come here, apart from the overall crime numbers. It explains the (extreme) behavior of black neighbors that I had or the extreme unruliness of (groups of) black school children, even when compared to Muslim Moroccans of similar socio-economic status – all of which I used to work with as an intern in schools in various Rotterdam neighborhoods. It explains quite a few other things as well.

Slavery: the real facts

The transatlantic slavery system from West Africa’s Gold Coast mainly to southern United States and Latin American plantations lasted from roughly 1502 to 1807, with the last illegal slave ship making it to Mobile, Alabama in 1859.

In recent years, largely due to secretive “liberal CIA” backing, it has become extremely common for so-called “anti-fascist” (antifa) groups in western society, in coordination with black activist groups as Black Lives Matter, to attack all symbols and remnants of the West’s transatlantic slavery system. Even before that there have been lawsuits by black descendants of the slave trade against modern-day companies involved in that trade two centuries ago.

True, the circumstances in which slaves were held at forts as Elmina Castle and transported on slaver ships were horrific. Equally horrific was the killing off of unfit slaves who couldn’t be sold in the New World. At the same time, it shouldn’t be forgotten that:

• an estimated 70% of the West-African population lived in permanent servitute to other Africans, with large numbers of slaves being brought in from central African kingdoms to serve new African masters in western Africa [42];
• the vast majority of slaves were provided to western slave traders by local African leaders, who were selling their own slaves (more valuable than gold), obtained through war, specific raids, debt, birth right, or criminal conviction [43];
• Muslim societies were even longer involved in the African (and East-European) slave trade, and laid waste to tribes as Jomo Kenyatta’s Kikuyu (which practiced female genital mutilation) – before the British colonialists arrived;
• countless empires in the history of the world have made use of slaves;
• the West, in no small part due to opposition from the lower classes, voluntary put a stop to the slavery system in the early 19th century;
• the British actively hunted slaver ships during much of the 19th century, the most successful ship in this effort being the HMS Black Joke;
• the British abolished widespread slavery among the African kingdoms as well, including among the Ashanti in Ghana and the Kingdom of Bonny in Nigeria, whose king was horrified by the ban [44];
• governments and large corporations were running the slave trade, the same elements who so often made western children and adults work 16 hours per day, 6 to 7 days a week, under conditions that resulted in average age of death as low as 17 in certain mines and factories.
• black crime, low genetic IQ and racism is an increasingly heavy burden to western society.

If anything, the slave trade simply was part of the usual class warfare. Apart from large corporations owning cotton, rice, sugar and tobacco plantations in the south of the United States and Latin America, we find all too familiar banks and insurance companies (or their predecessors) as Lehman Brothers, JPMorganChase, New York Life, N.M. Rothschild & Sons, Brown Brothers Harriman, Barclays and AIG that were using slaves as collateral for loans. [45] Barings, HSBC [46] and Lloyds of London [47] have also been mentioned as banks that used to benefit from the slave trade.

If we are asked to pay reparations to black people over the slave trade, as so often is suggested by the extreme left, every society should basically be paying reparations to every other one. It makes no sense. It is a very immature way of getting even – beyond immediate needs – and will only result in continued animosity down the line. For example, overly excessive reparations for World War I stood at the basis of World War II. Since then, look at how the West, including Germany and Italy, and Japan in the East have come together. Today western people feel as bad about the slave trade as black people, but the slavery system implemented by their (robber baron) ancestors centuries back is as far removed from them as it is for black people whose elite tribal leaders sold their African slaves to the western powers. Apologizing for “our” actions hundreds of years ago doesn’t make even the slightest sense.

Then there is an additional issue: why give money to a race/culture with vastly higher crime numbers than native whites? What good is going to come from that? White culture, concerned as it is with human rights, literally is the only hope of blacks to survive and thrive through slow integration and problem solving on African issues. Blacks aren’t particularly welcome in countries as Russia, China, or any Middle Eastern state. If any of these states would overtake the West as the predominant superpower, it’s unlikely to spent much time trying to solve African overpopulation in any kind of bleeding heart manner.

Point-summary of black crime rates

Summary of previously discussed statistics on black crime numbers:

• U.S. blacks on average already are 27% white, which should negate some of the ethnic crime and ethnic IQ issues.


• U.S. black teens commit up to 20x as many murders as white teens.
• U.S. blacks of all ages commit between 7 and 11x more murders than whites.
• U.S. blacks kill blacks about 5x more often than whites kill whites.
• However, U.S. blacks kill about 12x more whites than whites kill black people.
• U.S. blacks kill 18.5x more police officers than police officers kill black suspects.
• Black U.S. police officers INCORRECTLY shoot black suspects twice as often as white officers, and hispanic police officers 3x as often, with blacks being “overwhelmingly” represented in police shootings.


• U.S. blacks commit between 27 and 42x more violent crime against whites than whites in reverse.
• U.S. blacks have at least been 6x overrepresented in robbery for decades, are 15x more incarcerated for this crime (indicating they commit the more violent ones), with higher numbers here and there popping up. Let’s label the latter numbers as unconfirmed though.
• U.S. blacks are 5.5x more likely to be involved in incidents of gang rape. This is a very low number compared to Europe.


• Traditionally 90 to 95% of prison rapes have been black-on-white (the remainder mainly white-on-white), with smaller young white males being targeted out of racist motives.


• 27.6% of South Africans, who are 90% black, have openly admitted to having raped at least one woman in their life. At least one South African police officer who spoke to ISGP estimated the number between 33 and 50%.
• Rape is endemic in most Sub-Saharan African countries.
• “Africans” living in the Netherlands commit 15x as many rapes as native whites, and are the only race with higher rape than sexual molestation numbers. Gang rape and street rape numbers should be 20x or higher.
• Over the 1985-1989 period, Black African immigrants into Sweden were 16.5x more often suspected of rape than native white Swedes.
• Somalis became the third-largest immigrant group into Norway in the 2000s, behind Poles and Swedes, but while the latter two didn’t start to appear in any rape statistics, the Somalis quickly rose to the number 2 spot for the amount of committed rapes, second only to the many times larger groups of Norwegians. Gambians also quickly started being overrepresented in rape statistics.
• U.K. blacks appear to be roughly 32x more often involved in gang rape than whites.
• Rape victims of European blacks and Arabs in the majority of cases involve white women. Dutch and Belgian police reports have specifically written so. Also: 95% of Norwegian violent street rapes are committed by black are Arab immigrants, with ethnic Norwegian women being the victim in 70-80% of cases.
  
• London blacks seem to be 15-20x more involved in “serious crime” than whites.
• In the Netherlands, overrepresentation in prisons for the four largest immigrant groups is as follows: Turkish (4.4x), Moroccan (7.6x), Surinam (10x; 45% black) and Antillean (22x; 85% black).
• Australian blacks – i.e. Aborigines – are 9.5x more often incarcerated than all other ethnicities – many of them more criminal than whites – combined.
• In Brazil, where American-Indian Mestizo “whites” already cause a lot of violent crime, blacks still are by far the most often incarcerated ethnic group.


• Surinams and Antilleans in the Netherlands are 4x more often single than native whites, exhibiting the least amount of family structure.
• 70% of Dutch Somali immigrants are long-term unemployed and likely another 10-20% is short-term unemployed.
• Various other Dutch African immigrants are hovering around the 40-60% range.
• U.S. black families receive 2.4x as often welfare as white familes and 3.1x more often cash assistance.


• African blacks already had enslaved each other to the tune of 70% or more when European and Arab slavers landed on their coasts.
• Western slavers bought their slaves from African leaders; they did not invade a prestine African tribal paradise.
• Black slaves were brought to the West by corporations simply because white people were too expensive, which is not all that dissimilar from today.
• When Europeans banned the slave trade, various African leaders protested heavily.

Various Latino and Muslim immigrants have crime rates situated between whites and blacks.

Conclusions

Honestly, I cannot imagine a lot of people being shocked or surprised by these crime numbers, certainly not those who do not have to feel threatened by these facts. It’s just another case of the media and political establishment hiding the obvious.

Personally, liberal establishment mouthpieces can call me a racist all day long, considering this establishment itself is responsible for an enormous amount of stress among the native population, not to mention countless rapes, gang rapes, murders, or even traumatizing robberies of white citizens. We in the West – especially Europe – have to deal with at least three or four times the crime numbers (10 times or more in the big cities) that most of us should be exposed to, because our liberal Bilderberg-allied overlords have decided that “We, the people” have no need for the facts. And because of that, maybe any time any native white citizen is robbed, molested, raped, or injured by a Third World immigrant from a background with a severely heightened crime rate, they should complain to the press and sue the government.

An important question to ask maybe is: how can truth be a bad thing? In other words: how can knowledge about black IQ and crime numbers be a bad thing? It’s not like race relations can get a whole lot worse. If anything, all the propaganda and immigration waves of the past few years have made tensions even more unbearable. The immigration route we’re walking is not working. We need a course correction. We need more sustainable policies. Not in the first place for the religious extremism and crime-ridden Third World, but for us, western civilization, the less criminal one, the more advanced one, the more civilized one, the more tolerant one. I mean, since when is it considered sound advice to not stand up for yourself? Especially when you’re the adult surrounded by dysfunctional children? We may not be perfect, but this is exactly what the situation is. And the crime numbers prove it.

Notes