The controversial plan to release Fukushima nuclear plant’s waste water

The controversial plan to release Fukushima nuclear plant’s waste water


Okuma, Fukushima Pref.

– Twelve years after a nuclear catastrophe triggered by a massive earthquake and tsunami, workers at the Fukushima No. 1 nuclear power plant in northeast Japan are preparing to release treated wastewater into the sea.

Operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings (Tepco) says the water has been filtered to remove most radioactive elements, and calls the release both safe and necessary, but there has been domestic and international opposition.

Why does the water need to be released?

The site produces 100,000 liters of contaminated water daily. It is a combination of groundwater, rainwater that seeps into the area, and water used for cooling.

The water is filtered to remove most radionuclides, and more than 1.32 million tons of treated water was being stored at the site as of February. That accounts for 96% of storage capacity, so Tepco is keen to start releasing the water soon.

Under a plan approved by the central government, the process is expected to begin this spring or summer.

Is it safe?

Tepco says several filtering systems, including in its ALPS facility, remove most of the 62 radioactive elements in the water, including caesium and strontium, but tritium remains.

Experts say tritium is only harmful to humans in large doses, and Tepco plans to dilute the water to reduce radioactivity levels to 1,500 becquerels per liter, far below the national safety standard of 60,000 becquerels per liter.

The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) has said the release meets international standards and “will not cause any harm to the environment.”

Neighboring countries, including China and South Korea, along with activist groups such as Greenpeace and some local residents are strongly opposed to the release.

Local fishermen fear the release would once again make consumers wary of buying their catch.

“We have suffered reputational damage since the disaster, and we will go through that all over again, starting from zero,” fisherman Masahiro Ishibashi, 43, said.

How will the water be released?

The operator is constructing more filtering facilities on the shore and a kilometer-long underwater pipe to release treated water over several decades.

“We don’t plan to release the water all in one go, it will be a maximum of 500 tons a day of the total 1.37 million tons of ALPS-treated water,” Tepco official Kenichi Takahara said.

“It will take 30 to 40 years, the time required for decommissioning the plant.”

The operator will cap the amount of radioactivity from tritium discharged at 22 trillion becquerels per year, which was the national annual standard for wastewater releases before the accident.

What has the reaction been?

Japanese diplomats have been briefing nearby countries on the plan, and Tepco is meeting local residents in a bid to win support.

Their latest project involves keeping fish in the treated water.

“Fish kept in the ALPS-treated water … do ingest tritium, to some extent. But once the animal is transferred to normal seawater, the level of tritium in the fish quickly lowers,” said Kazuo Yamanaka, who is in charge of the trials.

He keeps hundreds of flatfish and other sea creatures in several tanks at the plant — half with ordinary seawater and the other in treated wastewater, diluted to around the same level as the liquid that will be discharged.

He runs a live stream of the fish on YouTube, and plans to expand the trials to seaweed.

“When we spoke with local residents, they said they wanted to see fish living healthily in the ALPS-treated water,” he said.

“They said they would feel more reassured when they saw it, rather than just seeing data and numbers.”

It remains unclear whether Tepco’s efforts can win over fishing communities that are still struggling to recover from the disaster.

“I don’t think the fisheries of Fukushima will truly recover until the day the nuclear plant shuts down,” Ishibashi said.