Friday Funnies: The Annual Shut-down.

Some things never seem to change.

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS OCT 3

















“There are two kinds of people in this world, those who fall off of horses and those who don’t ride…”

In my opinion, the above quote can be applied to many endeavors in life. 


On Tuesday, a Portuguese official came to our farm to inspect our young stallion, Quartz. We are super thrilled to announce that our homebred APSL (Lusitano) stallion Quartz CAL scored 73.8 on inspection and has been approved for breeding. That score is excellent – and getting him scored is the culmination of six years of work by not just Jill and I, but many people who have helped on the farm, helped train, provided veterinary care, hoof care and more.

It truly takes a village to create such a horse, and we are grateful to so many people.

As “senior citizens,” Jill and I remain committed to running a farm and homestead, as well as riding regularly. 

We choose to ride, but whatever your exercise, staying active is key to staying healthy.

On a personal note, the last couple of days have been brutal, with a lot of air travel and long road trips, including a drive from Austin to Dallas. Jill goes back home this evening, and I fly home tomorrow night.

Jill and I are girding our loins for the next four or five weeks – the travel schedule is heavy and leaves us very little time at home.

  • In October, we travel to Brussels for me to speak in the European Parliament at the Make Europe Healthy Again Conference.
  • Then we travel to the Netherlands to speak at a Scientific Conference.
  • On October 30-31, we speak at the Brownstone Annual Conference and Gala in Salt Lake City.
  • Then, on November 4-5, we fly to West Palm Beach for a CPAC Circle Retreat and Gala at The Mar-a-Lago Club November 4-7th, 2025
  • Then to Germany to speak in the Bundestag for the AFD party, and then to Rome to speak in the Italian Senate. 
  • Finally, we get to go home on November 10th.
  • November and early December continue with a lot more travel, including trips to Atlanta and Hawaii for a speaking tour.

However, we are optimistic that by mid-December, our travel schedule will level out, and we will not be booking engagements until early spring.









This meme is an old one, but as I read it – I actually feel more hopeful than I have have in the past.

It is beginning to feel like we are winning this war – at least here in the United States.

Tylenol, Leucovorin, and Child Neurodevelopment

Tylenol, Leucovorin, and Child Neurodevelopment

Just the proven biochemical, pharmacologic, and clinical facts, Ma’am.

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS SEP 25

Metabolism and transport of acetaminophen in the liver at highly toxic doses.

Figure 2, from “PharmGKB summary: Pathways of acetaminophen metabolism at the therapeutic versus toxic doses

Here we go again. Even former President Obama is jumping into the Tylenol/Acetaminophen controversy. Everyone is suddenly an expert, and every statement about public health must be politically weaponized. Suppose you had any doubt that Trump Derangement Syndrome is a real thing. In that case, all you need to do is watch the Instagram reels of left-wing pregnant women downing large doses of Tylenol, which is a high-speed route to the emergency room promptly followed by a potential rather unpleasant death from liver failure. Quod erat demonstrandum (QED).

And by the way, even way back in the day when I was an MD/PhD (Medical Research Scholar Training Program) student at Northwestern University in Chicago, we were taught to be on the lookout for suicide by Tylenol overdose. Whatever you may think of Northwestern U (now rather woke…), it was ranked in the top tier of US Medical Schools at the time, primarily due to its exceptional clinical training.

Note to those suffering from TDS- do not overdose on Tylenol. Tylenol overdose can kill you. How does it kill? By depleting a key molecule called glutathione, which is involved in the biochemical pathway by which Acetaminophen (eg Tylenol) is metabolized (broken down), which happens primarily in the liver. Like all drugs (and vaccines), Tylenol is toxic when taken in sufficient doses that exceed the “therapeutic window”. 

The only question is whether or not the FDA has previously defined that “therapeutic window” too broadly. And, in the case of the developing brain, data suggest a strong risk that, in fact, the FDA has been too promiscuous in its Tylenol dosing guidance. For the most part, epidemiological analyses suggesting otherwise appear to have been compromised by previously unrecognized and unaccounted-for confounding variables. I am running a few minutes late; my previous meeting is running over.

Sound familiar?

The FDA and US HHS are now moving to correct that longstanding oversight. POTUS, who has a deep, longstanding, 20 year personal interest in Autism and ASD, has announced this shift in FDA policy and guidance in a press conference. And both dead media and their clients have mounted an aggressive campaign to attack and delegitimize the messengers. But unlike propaganda and marketing, data and actual objective clinical/scientific research are stubborn things.

For budding, wannabe or armchair Biochemists and Pharmacologists, here are the gory details:

Acetaminophen metabolism occurs primarily in the liver through three main pathways: glucuronidation (accounting for 45-55% of metabolism), sulfation (30-35%), and cytochrome P450-mediated oxidation, mainly by CYP2E1, which produces the highly reactive toxic intermediate N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine (NAPQI). At therapeutic doses, NAPQI is rapidly detoxified by conjugation with glutathione (GSH), forming non-toxic metabolites excreted in the urine. However, during overdose, the glucuronidation and sulfation pathways become saturated, leading to increased oxidation and NAPQI formation, which depletes hepatic GSH stores; unbound NAPQI then covalently binds to cellular proteins, causing oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and hepatocyte necrosis.

For further details, see “PharmGKB summary: Pathways of acetaminophen metabolism at the therapeutic versus toxic doses”. 

Metabolism and transport of acetaminophen in the liver at highly toxic doses. After ingestion of highly toxic doses of acetaminophen, glucuronidation and sulfation pathways get saturated and higher portion of the drug gets oxidized and excreted unchanged. Excess NAPQI depletes glutathione stores causing liver injury. Administration of NAC provides an exogenous source of glutathione that will neutralize NAPQI and prevent further hepatotoxicity. Enzymes playing a major role in the corresponding pathway are denoted with a star. APAP, acetaminophen; APAP gluc, acetaminophen glucuronide; APAP-cys, acetaminophen cysteine; NAPQI, N-acetyl-p-benzoquinone imine; NAC, N-acetylcysteine. A fully interactive version is available online at http://www.pharmgkb.org/pathway/PA166117881.

What is Leucovorin?

What is this drug that the FDA and NIH are endorsing as a potential treatment for some cases of Autism/Autism Spectrum disorder (ASD)? Leucovorin is otherwise known as Folinic acid. It is basically a synthetic vitamin, chemically and pharmacologically related to the vitamin known as Folic acid or B9. 

Once again, for budding, wannabe or armchair Biochemists and Pharmacologists, here are the gory details: 

Folic acid and folate differ significantly in their chemical structure. Folic acid is the fully oxidized, synthetic form of vitamin B9, existing as a monoglutamate, meaning it contains only one glutamate residue. In contrast, naturally occurring folates in food are predominantly in the reduced form and exist as polyglutamates, containing multiple glutamate residues (typically more than one). The pteridine ring in folic acid is fully oxidized, which contributes to its high stability, whereas natural folates have a reduced pteridine ring that is chemically less stable and more susceptible to degradation by heat, oxidation, and light. Furthermore, folic acid is not found in nature and is not a normal metabolite, while folate is the generic term for a group of compounds with similar nutritional properties, including natural food folates and bioactive reduced forms. The chemical structure of folic acid consists of a pterin ring conjugated to para-aminobenzoic acid (PABA) by a methylene bridge, which is then linked to a single glutamic acid residue via a peptide bond.

Adequate levels of folate are necessary to support fetal and child neurodevelopment. Administration of Folinic acid to a subset of children with ASD can result is marked improvements in ASD symptoms, including overall cognitive and communication function.

As mentioned, Folinic acid has been clinically observed to provide benefits to a subset of patients suffering from ASD.

Here are some references that you (or Dead Media narrative reinforcers masquerading as “reporters” ) might wish to review-

James SJ, Melnyk S, Fuchs G, Reid T, Jernigan S, Pavliv O, Hubanks A, Gaylor DW. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Dec 3;89(1):425-30. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.2008.26615. PMCID: PMC2647708

Frye RE, Sequeira JM, Quadros EV, James SJ, Rossignol DA. Mol Psychiatry. 2012 Jan 10;18(3):369-81. doi: 10.1038/mp.2011.175. PMCID: PMC3578948

Frye RE, Slattery J, Delhey L, Furgerson B, Strickland T, Tippett M, Sailey A, Wynne R, Rose S, Melnyk S, Jill James S, Sequeira JM, Quadros EV. Mol Psychiatry. 2016 Oct 18;23(2):247-256. doi: 10.1038/mp.2016.168. PMCID: PMC5794882

Sun C, Zou M, Zhao D, Xia W, Wu L. Nutrients. 2016 Jun 7;8(6):337. doi: 10.3390/nu8060337. PMCID: PMC4924178

Apparently these findings are supported by expert opinion and research at the NIH. Notice anything about these publications and journals? These findings are not being published in ‘big” journals. Despite the growing incidence and prevalence of ASD, this basic and clinical research area has been treated as if any research or findings relating to ASD diagnosis and treatment are outside the Overton window of allowable medical and scientific discourse.

Why, you ask? Good question. I do not have a good answer. “Ask your doctor”.

How are glutathione and folic acid related to neurodevelopment?

Glutathione and folic acid are both closely tied to neurodevelopment, although through different yet interconnected biochemical pathways. Folic acid fuels the methylation cycle and supplies precursors for glutathione, while glutathione safeguards the developing brain from oxidative stress. Together, they form a biochemical partnership essential for healthy neurodevelopment.

Tylenol depletes the body’s reserves of glutathione by the mechanisms discussed above. At sufficient doses, this can cause death. At sublethal doses in infants and the developing fetus, reduction in available glutathione can result in neurodevelopmental damages. 

Commonly recommended prenatal folic acid administration during pregnancy improves outcomes partly because it supports both methylation for neurodevelopment and glutathione production for oxidative balanceLow glutathione levels have been observed in some children with neurodevelopmental disorders, and boosting folate/related nutrients (B12, B6, betaine) can sometimes improve redox balance. There are currently active investigations into whether supporting folate-dependent glutathione pathways can reduce neurodevelopmental risk in susceptible populations.

Folic Acid in Neurodevelopment

  • DNA synthesis & repair: Folic acid (vitamin B9) is crucial for one-carbon metabolism, which provides methyl groups needed for DNA synthesis and repair during rapid cell division in the developing brain.
  • Neural tube closure: Adequate folate in early pregnancy prevents neural tube defects (like spina bifida and anencephaly). This is why folic acid supplementation is universally recommended before and during pregnancy.
  • Methylation & gene regulation: Folate supports S-adenosylmethionine (SAMe) production, the body’s main methyl donor, which regulates gene expression via DNA and histone methylation. Epigenetic regulation is vital for brain development and function.

Glutathione in Neurodevelopment

  • Master antioxidant: Glutathione protects developing neurons from oxidative stress, which is especially high in the brain due to rapid growth and high oxygen consumption.
  • Detoxification: It helps remove reactive oxygen species and toxic byproducts that, if left unchecked, can impair neuronal migration, synapse formation, and myelination.
  • Redox regulation: Beyond antioxidant defense, glutathione influences redox signaling that guides normal neuronal differentiation and survival.

The Link Between Folic Acid and Glutathione

  • Shared pathway: one-carbon metabolism
    • Folate metabolism produces homocysteine. Homocysteine can either be remethylated back to methionine (with folate/B12 help) or enter the transsulfuration pathway, where it ultimately contributes to glutathione synthesis.
    • In other words, folate status indirectly determines how much raw material is available for glutathione production.
  • Balance of methylation vs. antioxidant defense: The body must allocate one-carbon units between methylation (epigenetics, DNA synthesis) and glutathione (redox protection). Both are critical for neurodevelopment.
  • Deficiency links: Low folate can raise homocysteine and impair glutathione synthesis, leading to both oxidative stress and disrupted epigenetic programming—factors implicated in conditions such as autism spectrum disorder, developmental delay, and neural tube defects.

Those are just the facts, Ma’am. And by the way, neither Obama during this three terms as POTUS/shadow POTUS nor his HHS “leadership”, did nothing substantial about autism and ASD, and he has absolutely no medical training. That is also a fact.

Now there is an issue that Dead Media narrative reinforcers SHOULD be looking into.

Sunday Strip: Man Over Board! Drowning in gender ideology

Sunday Strip: Man Over Board!

Drowning in gender ideology

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS SEP 21
 
READ IN APP
 


True Story!



























Malone News is a reader-supported publication. To support our work here and elsewhere, please consider becoming a paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid



Thanks for reading Malone News! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share



“Oughtism” is the governmental gateway phrase to “democratic” socialism.

Democratic socialism is the gateway to communism.




Friday Funnies: The Fall is Coming

Friday Funnies: The Fall is Coming

Let’s give ’em pumpkin to talk about.

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS SEP 19
 
READ IN APP
 






For anyone wanting to watch the ACIP meeting today at the CDC, here is the link:

If you stop watching or the video is paused, refresh the page to watch the current debate. Otherwise, the site will play from where it was last watched.













Thanks for reading Malone News! This post is public, so feel free to crosspost, forward via email, or share it on social media and notes!

Share





Malone News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid









Sunday Strip: The CounterFactual. Cancel culture canceled.

Sunday Strip: The CounterFactual 

Cancel culture canceled.

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS SEP 14
 
READ IN APP
 






OK- this one starts slower but gets better and better. Very sweet!





The Washington Post is evil.







Malone News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid


Thanks for reading Malone News! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share



The Enemy Within: Tyler Robinson – Charlie Kirk’s Assassin – is Trantifa!

The Enemy Within: Tyler Robinson – Charlie Kirk’s Assassin – is Trantifa!

Charlie Kirk’s Assassin, Domestic Terrorism and Left Wing Violece

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS SEP 13∙PREVIEW

The opinions expressed below are my own, and do not represent those of the US Government, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, or the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.

The day after the assassination of Christian youth leader Charlie Kirk, I made the case that it was necessary to wait for confirmation and additional information concerning the shooter and his motives. The recovered rifle and inscribed bullet casings seemed all too convenient, seemingly directing anger and blame towards certain left-wing subcultures. The needed information and confirmation are now available. This was not a lone wolf, this was a representative of a violent left wing subculture, a branch of the Antifa movement known as Trantifa or Transtifa.

If the Turning Point USA organization represents youth reaching for the light and a healthy, positive future, Trantifa is its dark counterpoint. Both compete and are engaged in recruiting and influencing the belief structures of American youth. Corporate media and their leftist echo chamber are guilty of actively and repeatedly portraying Turning Point USA as “far right” and falsely linking this Christian organization to either Fascism or the Neo-Nazi movement. But this is psychological projection and a perversion of both truth and the historic record. Historically, Fascism has always come from the left.

I am confident that certain Democrat party Senators and their aides, as well as their left-leaning Corporate media allies, will be tempted to misconstrue my words. To be explicitly clear, I am now calling on the US Federal Government and its legal investigative, enforcement, and homeland security capabilities to respond in full force to a domestic terrorist threat. I am not calling for, and specifically condemn vigilante violence. This has to be done rigorously, methodically, properly, professionally, and legally.

Based on available information, it is reasonable to infer that a member of the violent leftist organization self-identifying as “Antifa” would consider the founding leader of Turning Point, Charlie Kirk, as a high-value target. Cutting-edge social media researchers and image data mining specialists are rapidly accumulating confirmatory data, but for those who can read the meaning, the inscribed bullet casings tell the story.

Quoting Utah Governor Cox:

The three unfired castings were etched with the following:

“Hey Fascist! Catch! with an up arrow, right arrow, and three down arrow symbols”

“Oh beta chow bela chow bela chow chow chow”

“If you read this, you are gay lamo”

The spent casing carried the following inscription:

“Notices. Bulges. OWO. What’s this?” 

What do the Inscriptions Mean?…

Friday Funnies: “With a high degree of certainty, we have him” [no nie bój się to MEM-y]

Friday Funnies: : “With a high degree of certainty, we have him”

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS SEP 12
 
READ IN APP
 

For those that haven’t seen this breaking news:

22-year-old Tyler Robinson is currently in custody for the assassination of Charlie Kirk, after his Father and Minister Turned Him In!



“With a high degree of certainty, we have him – in custody.”

– President Trump




“Charlie Kirk wasn’t killed because he spoke. He was killed because our children listened.”



The memes are a little difficult this week – on one hand, we have all seen so many Charlie Kirk tributes and memes. What more can be said or read? This sadness is here in our hearts, and it is not going away any time soon.

But on the other hand, other news and memes seem trivial in comparison.

But maybe we all just need to relax and laugh a bit. So here goes…



Our enemies who reside in the USA must be fought using the law and truth, not violence.

But we have God, our American spirit, and righteousness on our side; we will prevail against evil.






We can argue the numbers shown – skewing up or down, but who can guess what this represents?







Wait- does that meme above mean that Joe Biden lost again?







CRUSHING IT!


Vape shops - "sklepy z waporyzatorami". I tak nie wiem co to znaczy; i nie chcę się dowiedzieć MD
===========================


Malone News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber. To our paid subscribers, your dollars help keep us going. Thank you!

Upgrade to paid


Thanks for reading Malone News! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share









Invite your friends and earn rewards

If you enjoy Malone News, share it with your friends and earn rewards when they subscribe.

Invite Friends

Regarding the Assassination of Charlie Kirk

Regarding the Assassination of Charlie Kirk

I considered Charile Kirk a friend and spiritual mentor. Please don’t jump to conclusions.

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS SEP 11

Wikipedia calls him a “right-wing political activist.” That is a gross distortion and over-simplification. Speaking personally, I am deeply saddened and impacted by this assassination. I believe that Charlie was a future president and a gifted communicator, with a remarkably agile mind coupled to a deep commitment to Christianity, the United States, and to the founding principles of this country. His mind was a beacon, and his heart was pure and kind.

His assassination was an act of political violence, one that I think is on par with the notable domestic US political assassinations of the 1960s. Given his role as both a political and a spiritual leader, I personally think that the best analogy is the assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King. Others criticize me for saying that. Time will tell on that point. But it is indisputable that this event has occurred at a crucial point in modern US politics. The left and the Democrat party has suffered a major electoral defeat. It is facing a possible existential crisis, and yet not only refuses to reform and adapt but seems to be doubling down. The weaponized hate and division promoted on both social and corporate media is like nothing I have seen since the Vietnam war. 

And at this critical junction, as the political conflict is really heating up for the midterm elections, we have this. The left and their corporate media surrogates seem to think that the political right are over reacting, as if Charlie Kirk is, as one post on “X” posited, “just another Nazi”.” Just a MAGA leader. Just a Christian nutcase with influence over a small following of impressionable young students. Turning Point USA was just a fringe protest movement of far-right-wing radical youth. It is so easy to be infuriated at these intentional mischaracterizations. 

I feel that emotion tug at my gut, just as I felt the pull when a young doctor with TDS that was called to testify by Senator Blumenthal at the recent Homeland Security investigations committee accused me of promoting violence – as did the Senator. How could I not be furious at being defamed once again? But I did not have the luxury of letting my anger get the best of me.

The risk here is that those of us who identify with MAGA and MAHA movements will lose self-control, and jump to conclusions. After being subjected to years of targeted hate and (frankly) violence of a wide variety of forms, it is so, so easy to dehumanize those who oppose us just as they seek to dehumanize us. So easy in our anger to lash out and say, write, or post intemperate words. But, as Dr. Toby Rogers found out during the hearing, the internet never forgets. “Nuremberg 2” and metaphors involving death for our opponents do not move the ball down the field, and can come back to really bite. Our opponents will do anything to project onto us the violent intent that they themselves are guilty of. 

I am deeply disturbed and saddened by what has happened, and also by what i am learning about the left in this country by their words and actions. They live in a separate reality and have been dehumanizing us for years. In my mind, I am also gaining insight into the impact of the years of targeted hate directed at me. This evil is not banal. It is systemic. Last night on Newsmax I mentioned the prospect of civil war as a risk. The thought that this professional killing may have been backed by a foreign adversary keeps coming to mind. The USA is a powder keg. The left is filled with of hate, fury and frustration fanned by corporate media. The situation is a set up for foreign adversaries to act to light the fire.

I am very aware of the information first provided by Steven Crowder this morning:

But this narrative strikes me as all too convenient, too perfect. For me, this implied neat narrative about antifa and trans activism being the motivator for the shooting is too stereotypical. Too convenient. 

My point is that the United States, and the current Administration led by Donald Trump, has many global geopolitical enemies. Enemies are both foreign and domestic. At this point in time, US politics and civics have become a powder keg waiting to explode if it encounters a match. Why wouldn’t foreign or domestic enemies seek to light that match, to watch us explode with internal conflict? It is precisely what should be expected. It is the logical and foreseeable outcome of all of this promoted hate. 

Don’t bite on that hook. That is all I am asking. Keep that anger inside for now. Bide your time, watch, listen, think. You should be mad as hell about what just took place. I certainly am. But don’t be stupid. If you act out in either word or deed, our opponents will then weaponize that to justify more violence or violent rhetoric. Bide your time, and remember that it is early in the information cycle, and we do not have the facts we need to draw conclusions about motivation or responsibility. It may be that some evil force is trying to set off the powder keg for their own nefarious purpose. 

Thank you for reading and considering these opinions.

Best wishes, and God Bless America and the family of Charlie Kirk, who was not a far-right activist, but rather a great American leader, father, husband, and friend of all. I miss him and mourn for him deeply. I hope you do also.

Sunday Strip: Trust the Science™ … – Until you don’t

Sunday Strip: Trust the Science™

Until you don’t

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS SEP 7













Not to sound judgmental (but hey, I am being judgmental): 

If my parents had that much chaos and family disfunction as in the video above- it is easy to see how some adult children might chose to not engage in a similar pattern or behavior…

Which brings us to this trend among a certain liberal set of young adults:





If you nose, you nose.






Malone News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid


Thanks for reading Malone News! This post is public so feel free to forward or share it.

Share




For those that ignorantly argue that Acetaminophen has been around since the 1950s, without a rise in autism – until recently, “proving” without looking at the HHS data, that Secretary Kennedy must be wrong about the link with Acetaminophen and autism:

Some facts-

The use of Acetaminophen before and after vaccination of children was not recommended until the 1980s

Nor was Acetaminophen the recommended NSAID for pregnant women until the 1970s.

Timeline and Recommendations

  • By the 1980s-1990s: Acetaminophen became widely used for post-vaccination fever and pain relief in children as a standard part of aftercare.
  • 2000s: Official vaccine information statements (such as the CDC’s DTaP VIS last updated in 2007) included recommendations to use antipyretics like acetaminophen for 24 hours after vaccination to manage discomfort.
  • Late 2000s-Present: New research, including the pivotal Prymula et al. study, suggested prophylactic use might blunt immune response, resulting in newer guidelines discouraging routine prophylactic use—but still supporting therapeutic use if a child is in pain or develops a fever after vaccination.

Tylenol (acetaminophen) began to be widely recommended as the preferred pain reliever for pregnant women by the 1970s and 1980s, as concerns grew about the safety of alternatives like aspirin and NSAIDs during pregnancy.

So, yes – Acetaminophen has been around since the 1950s, but no – it has not been the drug of choice during pregnancy or for use during vaccination of children until much more recently…


Now, I have not seen the HHS report – but I do know that to prejudge a scientific report before it has been distributed doesn’t seem like science.

Furthermore, the HHS report apparently just confirms the overwhelming body of previously published peer reviewed literature linking Acetaminophen use and autism. In other words, the actual science supports the hypothesis of use linkage in this context to development of clinical autism.

Friday Funnies: Gaseous Senators and cows that fly

Friday Funnies: Gaseous Senators

and cows that fly

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS SEP 5







[circa 1660..md]




















When I see all these senators trying to lecture and “gotcha” Bobby Kennedy today all I can think is: You all support off-label, untested, and irreversible hormonal “therapies” for children, mutilating our kids and enriching big pharma. You’re full of shit and everyone knows it.

-VP JD Vance


Needle Phobia and Early Childhood Trauma

Needle Phobia and Early Childhood Trauma

Not all long term adverse events are physical, some are psychological

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS SEP 4

It is most likely the most common phobia in the USA – and yet no one speaks of it.

For some who suffer from needle phobia, the fear is so intense that they avoid doctors nd dentists altogether, to the point where they will completely avoid any visit that might include a needle stick. 

The issue is so prevalent that fainting from a needle stick is the cause of over half of the emergencies in dental offices (1).

Needle phobia affects at least 10% of the population, and yet has only recently been classified as an affliction. Since individuals with this condition often avoid medical treatment, it can pose a major obstacle in healthcare. The cause of needle phobia stems from a vasovagal reflex that causes a shock-like response when a needle puncture occurs. 

For some, the fear is so intense that they will completely avoid any doctor’s visit that might include a needle stick. 

Although many in the medical field used to believe that this was an inherited reflex, there is little evidence to support that hypothesis, which is based on the idea that humans are evolutionarily conditioned to fear puncture and cutting injuries. Countering that narrative is the fact that needle phobia often develops only after repeated exposure in children. That an ever larger percentage of the population, particularly younger people, are now needle-phobic. It is now generally accepted that needle phobia is due to an early-life traumatic event, often associated with vaccine administration.

Needle phobia can be severe, and people with this fear are often terrified of routine needle procedures. There is literature documenting that for some patients, the fear is so profound that they claim they would rather die than undergo a needle procedure. This intense fear can lead to health, social, and legal problems. The vasovagal response (fainting) associated with needle phobia has even caused deaths. But there is an even more sinister side to this that the medical profession doesn’t even acknowledge.

One meta-analysis of studies on needle phobia analyzed 119 original peer-reviewed research articles, “of which 35 contained sufficient information for meta-analysis. The majority of children exhibited needle fear, while prevalence estimates for needle fear ranged from 20-50% in adolescents and 20-30% in young adults. In general, needle fear decreased with increasing age. Both needle fear and needle phobia were more prevalent in females than males. Avoidance of influenza vaccination because of needle fear occurred in 16% of adult patients, 27% of hospital employees, 18% of workers at long-term care facilities, and 8% of healthcare workers at hospitals (2).”

Another study found that most people who experience needle phobia rate their fear as significant, with 52% of the people avoiding blood draws, and 33% avoiding vaccinations.

However, later publications do not provide any documentation that this is an inherited trait, and this thesis has largely been discounted. 

I queried various AIs on the subject of how much government funding has been spent on needle phobia. The answer was shocking:

There is not a publicly available record indicating large-scale, multi-million dollar government programs exclusively for “needle phobia” research; most funding is embedded within broader health, vaccine, or mental health initiatives.

The truth is that our government has spent almost nothing to determine the cause or how to manage this condition for those living with this chronic disease. It is almost as if they don’t want to know.

Why is this important?

It is postulated that needle phobia impedes both chronic and acute patient visits to medical care providers and systems. One peer-reviewed paper had needle-phobic patients on record as saying they would rather die than get a needle stick. 

How many deaths occur each year because someone didn’t want to get that lump checked out because of a fear of needles? How many people suffer a cardiac event and choose not to go to the doctor because of this fear, until it is too late? How many people have unchecked diabetes because they refuse injectable medications?

Those who work with patients are fully aware that needle phobia often develops in childhood due to the often-repeated traumatic events surrounding vaccination. The following text is from a peer-reviewed paper discussing just how debilitating this phobia is:

Needle phobia without the vasovagal response has often arisen from a situation where classical conditioning has occurred. This puts it more in the realms of a specific phobia that is not B-I-I type. 

For instance, a patient who recalls being held down as a child while receiving vaccinations, or undergoing anaesthetic will have learned a paired association of ‘needles plus doctors equals pain and distress’. Therefore, being back in that situation produces distress to the extent that sufferers will simply avoid the situation.

Whether caused by vasovagal reactions or a conditioned response, in its most extreme forms, I have worked with many patients who were refusing life-saving treatment, as the anxiety of a cannula or blood test was too much. 

For instance, a 24-yr-old man with Hodgkin’s lymphoma was so distressed by the idea of cannulation that he refused to undergo chemotherapy. His wife was 4 months pregnant with their first child at the time and even this was not enough incentive for him to face his anxiety (3).

It is generally acknowledged that missed cancer diagnoses, cardiac arrests, and other life-threatening situations arise because people are so fearful of needles that they avoid seeking healthcare.

As the vaccine schedule has both increased in scope and the number of injections given at a very early age has skyrocketed, it can be surmised that needle phobia is increasing in the general population in the United States, following along with the increasingly aggressive vaccination schedule. Needle phobia generally starts in very young children, and only increases with each traumatic event.

By the age of two, a child in the USA receives almost 30 shots. 

A Canadian study of over one thousand children found that 63% of those born in 2000 or later now fear needles. In a 2017 study, this increase in prevalence was again quantified. Half of preschoolers who got all their boosters on the same day, with often four or five injections all at once, were severely afraid of needles years later.

This problem is growing.

In sorting through the publications, there are almost no data on how many preventable hospitalizations and even deaths are due to needle phobias each year. It is an entirely unstudied phenomenon. 

What is the risk-benefit ratio of repeatedly injecting a child with vaccines throughout their childhood? A child who then suffers the “mild” consequences of injection site pain, fatigue, hot-flashes, muscle soreness, nausea, and other vaccine-induced side effects that medical personnel consider perfectly normal? When does preventative medicine cross the line from being “preventive” to abusive?

The Butterfly effect.

Could it be that whatever gains made from the most aggressive vaccine program in the world (courtesy of the USG CDC) is making people sicker, as so many needle-phobic individuals refuse most or even all medical and even dental care because of their fear of needles?

Yet, throughout the peer-reviewed literature, it is generally accepted that the number of people who reject medical care if a needle is involved continues to grow. 

It is an unfortunate truth that none of this is being measured. There are no government grants to assess the risk-benefit analysis of the most aggressive vaccine campaign in the world.

A simple shot in a child’s arm at a vulnerable age or mindset, or maybe repeated shots, could cause real psychological damage. The extent of which isn’t being measured.

A Shot in Every Arm.

A child who follows the CDC vaccination schedule from birth until adulthood typically receives between 54 and 60 vaccine doses by age 18, depending on the combination of vaccines used. 

So many questions remain unanswered.

  • What is the long-term mental health consequences of this aggressive vaccination regime?
  • What percentage of people with needle phobia, became that way due to vaccination at vulnerable age points?
  • Research has shown that children develop needle phobia during specific age brackets. What are those age brackets?
  • What is the percentage of people who have suffered a significant health event or even death because of needle phobia?
  • How many people are so shamed by their fear of needles that they can’t share this fear with their physicians, instead avoiding medical treatments altogether?
  • Isn’t it time that government officials faced up to the fact that we don’t have the answers that they need to make informed decisions being made in the name of public health, that may actually be causing real harm.

The Bottom Line

The fundamental idea that a true “risk/benefit” analysis of vaccination, or any other medical procedure for that matter, can be calculated is fundamentally flawed. Particularly in situations where the State intervenes to coerce, entice, and/or compel (mandate) acceptance of a medical procedure. There are too many variables, known and unknown. 

At the root of modern Western “public health” is the thesis that the State has the right to mandate medical procedures to advance “the greatest good for the greatest number”, a logic that is based on socialist utilitarianism. Yet this is what three-year “Masters in Public Health” (MPH) university curricula teach. The consequence of these non-scientifically trained MPH dominating the US Public Health Service (and specifically CDC management) is that you have a cadre of trained socialists implementing mandates based on conclusions derived from imperfect and incomplete survey data compiled and analyzed by other socialists.

“A Midwestern Doctor” recently pointed out to me that at the most recent ACIP meeting, the following question was asked of a CDC official presenting data on COVID vaccine adverse events:

Question- “How are you monitoring long term side effects”

Answer- “But I think with relation to how are we thinking going forward about our safety and is it well adapted to the situation. I think we feel very confident in our safety systems in the US. We have one of the best safety systems in the world. But we are continuing to think through ways of how to improve them. And I think one thing you’re getting at is our ability to monitor long-term outcomes of vaccination. And obviously that’s very difficult. the longer you get out from vaccination, the more you can introduce confounding infections or other things that are unrelated to the vaccine and the in the ability to tease out vaccine versus other effects becomes much more challenging. But I think we would welcome input from the committee on um you know how to how to better do that.”

Which, distilled from this long-winded deflection, translates to “we are not monitoring long-term side effects because we think it is too hard to do this”.

In other words, the CDC is currently entirely unable to “calculate” risk/benefit ratio for these or any other vaccines. But this does not impede prominent “public health” officials or academics (or their dead media and captured politician allies) from cloaking themselves in “Science” and asserting that their policies and pronouncements shall not be challenged. 

COVID taught us to look beyond the curtain and let us see that the “Great Oz” of “Public Health” socialists were merely pretenders. 

When a “public health official” presumes to represent “The Science” and acts to manipulate the public into accepting an intervention based on imperfect data, “The Science” is being used as a pretense to justify authoritarian actions that are based on ideology and politics, not on an actual rigorous scientific assessment. And as the issue of needle phobia illustrates, in most cases the full spectrum of “Public Health” benefits, risks, and harms cannot be known and therefore risk/benefit ratio calculations (or quality adjusted life year calculations) become fictional propaganda.

By their own admission, CDC leaders are incapable of accurately and comprehensively assessing risk and benefit of any of their utilitarian interventions. There will always be unknown and in many cases unknowable variables. This applies to mask use, social distancing, lockdown policies, school closures and vaccine mandates. Therefore they are ill suited to make and attempt to enforce “public health policy”. And are completely unqualified to advocate for State-endorsed enticement, coercion and compulsion of any medical procedure or social intervention.

In a representative democracy governed by a constitution and bill of rights, policy must be made by elected officials. And in the case of medical procedures, that policy must be guided by the fundamentals of medical ethics, which do not provide the State with a special exemption for expediency. People, and specifically patients, have rights. And these rights do not allow the majority to force the minority to accept medical procedures. And they certainly do not provide an exception for a priesthood of Scientism to dictate what medical procedures they are to receive on the basis of socialist-utilitarian logic rooted in incomplete and imperfect data analyses.

Below is a clip of Mandy Cohen, former CDC Director, talking and laughing about how she made policy decisions during COVID. Her approach? She would ask friends, “Well, what are you planning to do?” And they would casually agree on some policy on the phone and then do that. The clip was recently highlighted in an “X” post by Dr. Kevin Bass, who is an actual scientist (molecular biologist and genomics expert).

This is the definition of arbitrary and capricious authority. This is Scientism, not science.

Six Principles of Medical Ethics

  1. Beneficance. Physicians must act in the best interests of the patient. Singular. One specific patient. Not in the best interests of society. Not to advance the greatest good for the greatest number. The patient in front of them at that specific point in time.
  2. Non-Malfeasance. In short, do no harm. This does not mean you can do some harm to some patients for the good of the many.
  3. Autonomy. The PATIENT has the right to choose whether to accept a medical procedure or intervention. Not Society, and certainly not some “Public health official” has the right to make a determination for a patient. THE PATIENT gets to choose. The physician and the “public health official” can provide honest truthful, unbiased information to the patient about risks and benefits, but THE PATIENT gets to decide on whether to accept the procedure. That is called INFORMED CONSENT, and if you disagree with that then you have no right to be involved in any way with the medical enterprise. There is no special “vaccine exclusion” or “exemption” for this fundamental human right.
  4. Justice. There should be no “tiered” or “special” medical care for some that is withheld from others. Treatment options should reflect the merit of the illness. No discrimination based on whether or not a patient has accepted or rejected some other medical procedure. Like withholding organ transplantation from those that refused a COVID genetic vaccine, for example.
  5. Dignity. Both Physician (or other medical care provider) AND THE PATIENT have the right to be treated with dignity. As opposed to hostile arrogance, for example.
  6. Truthfulness and Honesty: Patients deserve to know the whole truth about both illness and treatment to the best of the ability of the physician or medical care provider. No lies about mask or social distancing or lockdown effectiveness. No cover ups of adverse events. No lies about biodistribution, pharmacokinetics, lot variability, adulteration. 

Big Pharma’s Advertising Blitz: Billions on TV Ads, Medical Education, and Lobbying



Big Pharma’s Advertising Blitz: Billions on TV Ads, Medical Education, and Lobbying

Reporting by Trial Site News

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS SEP 1

trialsitenews

TrialSite Staff | Making Biomedical Research Evidence Accessible to All

Sep. 1, 2025,

Pharmaceutical commercials are nearly impossible to avoid in the United States. On average, American TV viewers see as many as nine drug ads per day, totaling about 16 hours a year—far more time than most people spend with their primary-care physician. Only the U.S. and New Zealand allow direct-to-consumer (DTC) prescription drug ads, making American airwaves a primary battleground for pharma marketing.

This saturation is intentional: repetition prompts patients to “ask your doctor” about brand-name drugs, which can steer demand. Policymakers have taken note. A GAO analysis found that 2016–2018 Medicare drug spending on advertised products accounted for 58% of Parts B and D outlays, underscoring how ad campaigns align with where public dollars go per the United States Government Accountability Office (GAO) 2021 Report to Committee on the Judiciary, U.S. Senate.

Billions Poured into Consumer Advertising

Pharma’s consumer advertising budgets have soared over the past decade. In 2018, companies spent ~$3.73B just on national TV ads; Humira alone accounted for ~$375M in TV placements. By 2022, total DTC advertising across platforms reached ~$8.1B.

A landmark JAMA study shows overall medical marketing (to both consumers and professionals) rose from $17.7B (1997) to $29.9B (2016), with DTC the fastest-growing segment while professional-targeted marketing remained the largest share.

Figure (JAMA 2019): Total U.S. medical marketing climbed from $17.7B (1997) to $29.9B (2016); DTC rose about five-fold, while marketing to health professionals stayed the largest slice.

Proponents argue ads can educate, surface under-diagnosed conditions, and de-stigmatize illnesses. Critics as reported in a Reuters entry counter that saturation inflates demand for high-priced brands and can exaggerate benefits. Both are represented in the literature.

“Education” or Promotion? How Industry Shapes Medical Learning

While TV and online ads target the public, even more is spent influencing clinicians. In 2016, spending directed at health professionals was ~$20.3B—about two-thirds of total promotional spend that year. Tactics include detailing (sales-rep visits), free samples, journal ads, and sponsorship of continuing medical education (CME).

Historically as shown 15 years ago, industry has funded about half of CME costs, and older analyses suggest companies anticipated ~$3.56 in additional sales for every $1 invested in CME sponsorship—an ROI that explains persistent sponsorship despite guardrails. (These are historic estimates; current mixes vary.)

Evidence shows exposure to industry promotion shifts prescribing toward sponsor brands (often pricier than generics). GAO and congressional reviews also link advertised drugs to higher Medicare spending shares suggests the 2021 Senate GAO report.

Lobbying and Political Muscle

Pharma doesn’t just market to patients and prescribers—it also invests heavily in policy influence. In 2024, the pharmaceuticals/health products sector spent a record ~$388M lobbying the federal government—the most of any industry. Cumulatively, since 1998 the sector has spent >$6.3B on federal lobbying.

Trade association PhRMA routinely ranks among the top single spenders.

Soaring Drug Sales and Industry Power

These outlays have coincided with—and arguably helped fuel—surging drug expenditures in the U.S. Total prescription drug spending rose 16% from $520B (2016) to $603B (2021), according to HHS/ASPE. IQVIA-linked reporting pegs 2022 spending at >$633B (payer net). Growth stems less from a doubling of prescriptions than from higher per-prescription costs and uptake of specialty drugs.

It’s difficult to prove causation between marketing/lobbying and market “power,” but the correlations are strong: heavy advertising builds blockbuster brands; sustained professional promotion keeps them top-of-mind; and lobbying helps preserve favorable rules on pricing and DTC marketing. Analyses also show many leading firms spend more on sales & marketing than on R&D in a given year (e.g., 9 of 10 in one 2019 analysis; 7 of 10 during 2021), highlighting how promotion remains central to the business model.

Finally, context matters: the $29.9B total medical marketing (2016) rivaled the NIH’s annual budget and was about six times the FDA’s, underscoring the scale of private promotional spend relative to public science and oversight as reported to Congress.

Bottom line

Pharma’s DTC ad presence on U.S. television is pervasive, but it’s only the tip of a larger influence strategy that includes professional promotion and record lobbying. Over the past decade, spending across these channels has surged, as have drug revenues and policy influence. Whether one views DTC as education or enticement, the evidence shows the industry’s marketing-and-lobbying engine has helped shape what drugs Americans see, which ones they get prescribed, and how much we all pay for them. And given the troubles and scandals such as Vioxx, and OxyContin, are collective vigilance should be up.

Sources

TV ad exposure: Ventola 2011; Parekh 2018; DTC legality (US/NZ): Johns Hopkins / JAMA; GAO findings (58% Medicare spending on advertised drugs, 2016–2018): GAO-21-380; TV spend 2018 & Humira: FiercePharma; DTC total 2022 (~$8.1B): FiercePharma roundup; CME funding & ROI (historic): Brody 2009; commentary noting ~50% CME funding; Lobbying: OpenSecrets (2024 $388M; >$6.3B since 1998); Drug spending: HHS/ASPE (2016–2021 to $603B); NASEM/IQVIA reference (> $603B payer net / 2022 > $633B) and finally “Marketing vs. R&D” (many top firms): RAPS 2019; AHIP 2021.

How the American Academy of Pediatrics Betrayed Children Everywhere

How the American Academy of Pediatrics Betrayed Children Everywhere

by: Clayton J. Baker, MD

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS SEP 1

The prime directive of Western medicine, its golden rule, is expressed by the Latin maxim primum non nocere – first, do no harm. Unfortunately, the Covid era taught us that from the patient’s point of view, a better motto for our times might be caveat emptor – let the buyer beware.

Every medical student is taught that, first and foremost, they should not cause harm to their patients, and every doctor is familiar with this maxim. It is echoed in the Hippocratic Oath and forms the basis for the four pillars of medical ethics: autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice.

This rule, and the core tenets of medical ethics that it underpins, were all abandoned during the Covid era. They were replaced with a brutal, inhumane, and unethical martial-law-as-public-health approach to medicine. The results were unconstitutional lockdowns, prolonged school closures, suppression of early treatment, mandated vaccinations, and silencing of dissenting views. These abuses were justified by constant propaganda and lies from public health authorities, the medical establishment, the mainstream media, and medical professional associations.

Enter the American Academy of Pediatrics.

The American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) is the largest professional association for pediatricians in the United States. Nearly one hundred years old, the AAP’s motto is “Dedicated to the Health of All Children.” But as with so much of the medical establishment, the Covid era revealed that the AAP has abandoned its stated mission, and in the process, it has betrayed children everywhere.

During the Covid era, no group was harmed more – or more unnecessarily – than children, who lost multiple years of education, socialization, and normal growth and development. Many millions of kids also received the fraudulently tested, toxic, experimental mRNA-based injections that were coercively imposed upon the population at large. Countless children have been harmed or killed by these products, with myocarditis being only the most universally acknowledged of the many toxicities associated with the shots.

Adding insult to injury, it was known from the beginning of the pandemic that the gain-of-function-produced SARS-CoV-2 virus affected children very mildly, rarely causing severe illness, and almost never killing them. Even at the height of the pandemic, an article in the preeminent journal Nature described pediatric Covid deaths as “incredibly rare.” A very large population-based Korean study from 2023 found the case-fatality rate in children from Covid to be well under 1 death in every 100,000 cases.

If no segment of the population was harmed more egregiously than children during the Covid era, few medical organizations betrayed their patient population more thoroughly than the American Academy of Pediatrics.

While the AAP has for many years taken questionable stances on a variety of issues, including the ever-enlarging pediatric vaccine schedule, “gender reassignment,” and others, at one early point during Covid, the AAP did attempt to advocate appropriately in the interest of children. It didn’t last long, however, and a review of this incident shows how the AAP, like so many other medical professional organizations, effectively sold its soul during Covid.

Summer 2020: The AAP Changes Its Tune on In-School Learning

From mid-March 2020, when the Covid lockdowns began, until the end of that school year in June, most American schoolchildren had been kept completely out of school. On July 9, 2020, the AAP released a statement arguing forcefully for the return of American schoolchildren back:

The AAP strongly advocates that all policy considerations for the coming school year should start with a goal of having students physically present in school. The importance of in-person learning is well-documented, and there is already evidence of the negative impacts on children because of school closures in the spring of 2020.

The July AAP statement went on to say that school closure “places children and adolescents at considerable risk of morbidity and, in some cases, mortality.” It went even further to state that:

the preponderance of evidence indicates that children and adolescents are less likely to be symptomatic and less likely to have severe disease resulting from SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, children may be less likely to become infected and to spread infection.

All of these claims the AAP made in July 2020 were known to be true to those who did the proper research (as the AAP apparently had done), and they have been repeatedly and definitively confirmed in the following years.

I was acutely aware of that July 9, 2020, AAP statement. I used it as an important resource in my own advocacy during the summer of 2020 to try to get schools reopened for full-time learning in New York State by the fall. The July AAP document was a well-researched, well-constructed, and well-argued advocacy tool that supported all children’s best interests.

So far, so good. Very soon thereafter, however, the AAP shamefully succumbed to pressure from public health officials, teachers’ unions, and others pushing for continued school closures. By August 19, 2020, with school reopening imminent, the AAP suddenly “revised” their recommendations. The AAP dramatically changed its tune, stating that they would go along with whatever measures public health officials decreed:

…many schools where the virus is widespread will need to adopt virtual lessons and [AAP] is calling for more federal funding to support both models.

“This is on us – the adults – to be doing all the things public health experts are recommending to reduce the spread of the virus,” said AAP President Sara “Sally” H. Goza, M.D., FAAP.

In an act of cowardice and dereliction of duty, the AAP surrendered. It abandoned the strong and sound advocacy for normalizing children’s education contained in its July document. As a physician actively following the issues of the day surrounding Covid and publicly fighting for school reopening, I can testify that nothing changed regarding our knowledge of the virus that justified the AAP’s abdication of its responsibility to children. In fact, multiple foreign countries had already returned children to school without ill effect. The AAP’s capitulation significantly undermined school reopening efforts, especially in Blue states.

The AAP’s sudden and craven volte-face regarding in-school learning was just one of many disgraceful acts committed by medical associations during the Covid era, and it acted to the severe harm of schoolchildren across the nation. Millions of American schoolchildren continued to languish in “remote” or “hybrid” learning for the entire 2020-2021 school year. Many thousands simply dropped out of school, never to return.

In retrospect, the AAP cannot claim that they “didn’t know” enough to push for school reopening. Their July 2020 document proves they knew the correct course of action – before caving in to the establishment’s false narrative, and then subsequently devolving into just one more shameless shill organization, pushing for the mass inoculation of children with the toxic Covid mRNA injections.

Why would the AAP have done such a thing?

Money, for one thing. And plenty of it.

The AAP’s Federal Funding Windfall During Covid

As the Covid vaccine push intensified, the AAP became one of the trusted legacy medical associations that was handsomely rewarded to “push vaccines and combat ‘Misinformation’.” By 2023, the year for which data is most available, the AAP was absolutely raking it in.

As journalist Michael Nevradakis explains:

AAP… received $34,974,759 in government grants during the 2023 fiscal year, according to the organization’s most recent tax disclosure. The grants are itemized in the AAP’s single audit report for 2023-2024.Documents show some of the money was used to advance childhood vaccination in the U.S. and abroad, target medical “misinformation” and “disinformation” online, [and] develop a Regional Pediatric Pandemic Network.

In summary: in July 2020, the AAP ever-so-briefly and correctly sided with the lockdown dissenters, in service of its self-proclaimed motto to serve “the health of all children.” But by mid-August, the AAP switched sides and subsequently got a massive payout to do so. In fiscal 2023 alone, the AAP was receiving $35 million of tax money, much of it directly tied to pushing the Covid mRNA shots in children and to silence dissenters, whom it knew were telling the truth.

Unfortunately, this is unsurprising. Years before Covid, the AAP had already morphed into a highly compromised organization, straying far from its stated goal of being “dedicated to the health of all children.”

The Dinosaurs Sell Themselves to Survive

The business model for the old establishment medical professional organizations, like the AAP, is a dinosaur. The value of paid membership to these organizations has disappeared over the years, causing income from membership fees to fall. Individual paid subscriptions to their flagship journals have nosedived as well. Their financial survival increasingly relies upon Big Pharma largesse and, as we saw above for the AAP during Covid, government payouts.

In return for Big Pharma and government money, these professional organizations function less and less as champions for their professional members and their patients. They become mouthpieces for government initiatives and advertisers for Pharma. If you’ll pardon the mixed metaphor, they have become a strange species of dinosaur-prostitutes.

The AAP in particular is deeply tied to and heavily subsidized by Big Pharma, especially in the area of vaccine promotion.

Starting with the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act (NCVIA), which effectively eliminated tort liability for vaccine manufacturers, the CDC pediatric vaccine schedule has ballooned from 7 vaccines in 1985 to 23 vaccines (and over 70 total doses!) in 2024. Since then, the AAP has largely been in the vaccine promotion business.

In accordance with the CDC vaccine schedules, the Federal government purchases huge quantities of the recommended vaccines from pharmaceutical companies. The shots are promoted to the public and to physicians through well-paid organizations like the AAP, and administered by pediatricians, many of whom receive payment – essentially kickbacks – to do so. Every step of the way, palms are greased.

As a result, American children have become what Dr. Meryl Nass calls “a delivery system to transfer taxpayer funds to big pharmaceutical companies, via your child or grandchild’s arm.”

As HHS Secretary Kennedy recently noted, the AAP posts on its own website its financial indebtedness to its corporate “donors.” Lo and behold, the four top vaccine manufacturers for the products on the pediatric vaccine schedule – Merck, Pfizer, Moderna, and Sanofi – stand at the top of the AAP’s corporate “donor” list. (The total amounts of the payouts the AAP receives are not disclosed.)

The AAP, originally created a century ago to advocate for pediatricians and their patients, has devolved into an advertiser and lobbyist for the corporate interests that fund their operations. So much for “dedicated to the health of all children.


Sunday Strip: An Apple a Day Keeps the Deep State Away!

Sunday Strip: An Apple a Day Keeps the Deep State Away!

Choices matter, so choose wisely.

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS AUG 31














Let’s ask GROK!

Because everything is public with politicians, this is what GROK had to say about Gavin Newsom’s “personal life” – that being his marriages, affairs, and divorce:

“Before entering the spotlight as San Francisco’s mayor, Newsom was involved in a few notable relationships. There were rumors of a brief fling with singer Jewel around 2005, though it was never confirmed.

His most prominent early relationship turned into marriage: He wed Kimberly Guilfoyle, a former prosecutor and TV personality (now known for her role on Fox News and engagement to Donald Trump Jr.), in 2001. They were often dubbed “the new Kennedys” by the media for their glamorous image and political ambitions.

The couple met in the 1990s through mutual friends in San Francisco’s social scene, and their wedding was a big event at a Catholic church.

However, their marriage hit rough patches, partly due to Newsom’s demanding mayoral duties starting in 2003 and Guilfoyle’s career pulling her to New York.

They separated in 2005 and finalized their divorce in 2006, citing the strains of bicoastal living.

Interestingly, they’ve remained on friendly terms—Newsom has even consulted her for political advice in recent years, despite their ideological differences.

The Affair and Post-Divorce Dating:

Shortly after his divorce, Newsom’s personal life made headlines again in 2007 when he publicly admitted to a brief affair with Ruby Rippey Gibney (then Ruby Rippey-Tourk), who was married to his then-campaign manager and close friend, Alex Tourk.

The affair happened in 2005 while Newsom was still married to Guilfoyle and serving as mayor. Rippey Gibney, who worked as his appointments secretary, later spoke out in 2018, saying the relationship devastated her marriage and led to personal struggles, including substance abuse issues.

Newsom apologized publicly, entered alcohol treatment briefly, and the scandal became a talking point in his later gubernatorial campaigns.

In the years following, Newsom dated a few women before settling down again. He had a short relationship with actress Sofia Milos in 2006, known for her roles in shows like CSI: Miami.

Then came Brittanie Mountz, a 19-year-old college student and restaurant hostess (sometimes described as a model), whom he dated from 2006 to 2007.

Their age difference (he was about 39 at the time) drew some media scrutiny, but it was relatively low-key compared to his other relationships.

Current Marriage:

Newsom met documentary filmmaker and actress Jennifer Siebel in 2006 at a fundraiser, and they married in 2008 in a ceremony at her parents’ ranch in Montana.

She’s since become California’s First Partner, advocating for gender equalityand producing films like Miss Representation and The Mask You Live In. They have four children.”




Trigger warning – the video below is rude and offensive. 

But it is so well done – and the message is on point – so that I am including it.







Malone News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid


Thanks for reading Malone News! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share




Secretary Kennedy is forced to play a rigged game – what the Senate has permitted is let one Senator with significant conflicts of interests to control HHS. 

This is not right, not proper, not fair.

This is a rigged system that undermines genuine reform.

Yes, the Senate has the right to advise and consent to the president’s selection of cabinet members. However, Senate rules should not allow a single Senator to impose unreasonable demands on a cabinet member to secure confirmation; this undermines the authority of the President of the United States. 

The Constitution outlines the separation of powers between the executive and legislative branches. These actions by Senator Cassidy are in breach of those powers due to Cassidy’s conflict of interest regarding the pharmaceutical industry.

Cassidy’s pharma ties, including campaign donations and lobbying dollars, as well as the BIO organization document linking Cassidy to their efforts to remove Sec. Kennedy raises legitimate questions about Cassidy’s influence in health policy, especially amid tensions with Kennedy’s HHS reforms.

It seems like there is an ethics violation here, and if not, it should be.

Friday Funnies: Time Warp

Friday Funnies: Time Warp

The Children are Watching

Robert W Malone MD, MS Aug 29, 2025







I grok this meme.






Lock me up and throw away the key, as I am posting another horrific, violent image:





DNC = MSM


Has anyone else noticed how, in the latest CDC “kerfuffle”, as reported by mainstream media, the media conveniently left out the manipulated RSV data story that seems to have originated from the CDC?

Also, they haven’t addressed the fact that one of the ex-employees, who resigned from the CDC, flaunted photos of himself dressed in what looks like bondage (S&M) gear on various dubious magazine covers after being hired by the Biden administration. These are magazine covers. Other photos from his old Instagram account are even more explicit. Now, what someone does in their private life – fine. I don’t want to know. But public health means promoting healthy behaviors.

How is it even possible not to cover these aspects of the firings and resignations?

As a sidebar, here are magazine photos of Dr. Demetre Daskalakas, who labels himself as the “Activist Doctor”, and was the “Senior Equity Advisor” (reporting directly to then CDC director Rochelle Walensky) during COVID, as he proudly displays his obsession with bondage as a badge of honor, during his tenure in the Biden administration. The CDC COVID picture during Biden/Harris is becoming clearer.

How was this employee in any way, shape or form fit to serve in the Trump administration – an administration working to Make America Healthy Again?

The children are watching.

“Activist Doctor” complains to the press that actual scientists are asking questions. Very interesting.











https://www.youtube-nocookie.com/embed/VeI1tPwXn6M?rel=0&autoplay=0&showinfo=0&enablejsapi=0



Malone News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.


Thanks for reading Malone News! This post is public so feel free to share it.

Share





Friday Funnies: Hands off our criminals!

Friday Funnies: La-La land Crazy

and other true stories

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS AUG 22


“The most valuable math you can learn is how to calculate the future cost of your current decisions.”

“Teach your children well”…









MS Now – Stands for “My Source News Opinion World”

Well, at least MS Now is admitting the elephant in the room, so to speak. What MSNBC and now, MS News do is spew their biased opinions of the news, not the news itself.


Going, going… gone.

The “new” rebrand of the Cracker Barrel restaurant is topped off with an interior featuring white walls and the removal of what has been labeled as “kitsch.” Which the CEO believes will give them a “fresh look.” 

But don’t worry, folks- they are adamant that they still intend to sell rocking chairs…

The end result of the media blitz: Cracker Barrel’s stock plummeted $94 million on Thursday. 

Cracker Barrel CEO Julie Felss Masino, who by appearance is another liberal white female CEO – recently gave a devastatingly honest assessment of the restaurant:

“We’re just not as relevant as we once were.”

Something tells me this “rebranding” ain’t going to help!


OK- this one is pretty funny (and true).


Over in La-La land…













Malone News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid


Thanks for reading Malone News! This post is public, so feel free to crosspost, share on notes or social media and forward via email.

Share



One more video:

This video raises a serious question… as to why bathroom scales no longer weigh ounces? Why did manufacturers change from ounces to tenths of a pound? What marketing genius decided that tenths was better than ounces (1/16 of a pound)? And why did we not notice or care?

Enquiring minds want to know, why did we all just accept this major change in our measurements without question and yet completely reject the metric system for common usage?


Have a great day folks!

Sunday Strip: You are here – Three and a half more years of winning.

Sunday Strip: You are here –

Three and a half more years of winning.

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS AUG 17













One can have empathy and still insist that our borders be respected.















True story. The above happened. It was real. Not made-up. We lived through this.

Ensuring that it never happens again – means that we can not forget and we can not let history erase the crimes that were committed in the name of public health.






The FDA’s War on Natural Thyroid: A Medical Tyranny That Threatens Millions

Robert W Malone MD, MS Aug 16 · Malone News. TARCZYCA
Please read this important essay and then take action to protest this latest affront to logic and natural medicine from the FDA. FAERS data show natural thyroid is very safe. Fortunately, Dr. Marty Makary @DrMakaryFDA recently tweeted that “FDA is committed to pursuing the first-ever approval of desiccated thyroid extract, pending results of the ongoing clinical trials. In the mean time, we will ensure access for all Americans.’ Please help Marty overcome his own bureaucracy and support women’s health! And consider subscribing to my fellow MAHA advocate Sayer Ji’s substack!

The FDA’s War on Natural Thyroid: A Medical Tyranny That Threatens Millions

How Regulatory Capture Threatens Access to a 130-Year-Old Treatment That Patients Overwhelmingly Prefer

SAYER JI AUG 16

Read, comment and PLEASE SHARE the X post dedicated to this article and call to action: https://x.com/sayerjigmi/status/1956722425493643308

The Opening Salvo

In what represents an unprecedented overreach of regulatory authority that prioritizes pharmaceutical profits over patient welfare, the FDA has declared war on 1.5 million Americans who depend on natural thyroid medications for their very survival. As Dr. Robert Malone warned in his urgent alert: “You might think that the FDA wanted older women to be disabled with brittle bones, cognitive decline, metabolic disease, obesity, and poor health.”[1]

This is the systematic dismantling of a treatment that has worked successfully for 130 years—since 1891 when Dr. George Redmayne Murray first used desiccated thyroid extract to save a woman dying from myxedema, an extreme form of hypothyroidism.[2] The FDA’s August 6, 2025 enforcement letters threatening to ban all natural desiccated thyroid (DTE) products—including Armour Thyroid, NP Thyroid, and Nature-Throid—represent medical tyranny designed to funnel billions into synthetic drug manufacturers while condemning millions to unnecessary suffering.

But here’s what makes this particularly egregious: natural thyroid is essentially ancestral food—organ meat that humans have consumed for millennia. The FDA is attempting to ban what is fundamentally a concentrated form of dietary thyroid gland, the same substance our ancestors prized as sacred medicine and nutrient-dense food.

The Bioidentical Illusion: Why Patient Experience Is Ontological Truth

Natural desiccated thyroid extract from a porcine source is the most physiologically complete thyroid replacement available. Unlike synthetic levothyroxine’s single-molecule approach, DTE provides:

  • T4 (Thyroxine): The storage hormone
  • T3 (Triiodothyronine): The active metabolic hormone
  • T2 (Diiodothyronine): Critical for mitochondrial function
  • T1 (Monoiodothyronine): Emerging metabolic roles
  • Calcitonin: Essential for bone health
  • UNKNOWN YET HIGHLY LIKELY: Yet to be fully characterized indispensable biological co-factors

As Dr. Malone emphasizes, “T3 is the active thyroid hormone responsible for controlling metabolism, heart and digestive functions, muscle and brain activity, growth, and temperature regulation. Its actions are more potent than its precursor T4, and balanced T3 levels are essential for good health.”[3]

The Molecular Deception

The FDA wants you to believe synthetic levothyroxine is “identical” to natural thyroid hormone. This is scientifically false. As GreenMedInfo’s research has revealed for over a decade, synthetic T4 is produced through a mind-numbingly complex chemical process involving “nitrating L-tyrosine,” “tetrazotized and iodized” compounds, and treatment with “aqueous HI in acetic acid.”[4] This Frankenstein molecule is then contaminated with up to 6% dextro-thyroxine, a mirror-image stereoisomer that is cardiotoxic and acts as an endocrine disruptor.[5]

One patent describes the dizzyingly complex process of levothyroxine synthesis as follows:

“The process for preparation of Levothyroxine sodium comprises the steps, wherein compound obtained from steps a-g is prepared by conventional methods, a. nitrating L-tyrosine to give 3,5- dinitro-L-tyrosine, b. acetylating 3,5- dinitro-L-tyrosine to give 3,5- dinitro-N-acetyl L-tyrosine, c. esterifying the compound obtained from step (b) to give 3,5- diπitro-N-acetyl L-tyrosine ethyl ester, d. reacting the compound obtained from step (c) with p-TsCI in presence of pyridine to give corresponding tosylate salt, which is further reacting with 4-methoxy phenol to give 3,5- DinKro-4-p-methoxy phenoxy-N-acetyl-L-phenyl alanine ethyl ester, e. the compound obtained from step (d) is hydrogenated to give 3,5-diamino-4-p-methoxy phenoxy-N-acetyl-L-phenyl alanine ethyl ester, f. the compound obtained from step (e) is tetrazotized and iodized to give 3,5-Diiodo-4-p- methoxy phenoxy-N-acetyl-L-phenyl alanine ethyl ester, g. the compound obtained from step (f) is O-demethylated, N-deacetylated, and deesterified using aqueous HI in acetic acid to give 3,5-Diiodo-4-p-hydroxy phenoxy-L-pheπyl alanine followed by preparing hydrochloride salt of same and isolating, drying it h. lodinating 3,5-Diiodo-4-p-hydroxy pheπoxy-L-phenyl alanine HCI salt using methyl amine.”

The critical epistemological issue is this: absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Just because current assays cannot detect functional differences between synthetic and natural T4 doesn’t mean such differences don’t exist. Biological systems are nonlinear and exquisitely sensitive to subtle variations that cascade into significant physiological effects.

Upgrade to paid

The Thyroglobulin Reality: Nature’s Infinite Complexity

The image above exposes the breathtaking gulf between natural and synthetic thyroid hormone. Natural desiccated thyroid contains T4, T3, T2, T1, and calcitonin bound to the massive thyroglobulin protein—a 660,000 dalton molecular complex representing millions of years of evolutionary optimization. Each hormone exists in specific conformational states, held in precise spatial relationships, creating an information-rich matrix the body recognizes holistically.

In contrast, synthetic hormone consists of isolated T4 molecules floating in pharmaceutical void, stripped of biological context, devoid of the intricate molecular choreography that defines natural thyroid function.

Levinthal’s Paradox and the Information That In-Forms

To understand the true magnitude of this difference, we must invoke Levinthal’s Paradox. For thyroglobulin to fold from a linear chain into its precise three-dimensional structure requires navigation through near-infinite conformational possibilities—a journey that would take longer than the universe’s age if done randomly. Yet it folds perfectly in milliseconds.

What Levinthal’s Paradox teaches us is that biological specificity contains inconceivable amounts of information—but not information as mere data. This is information as that which in-forms—that which puts form into biological matter, guiding the transformation of potential into actuality.

When thyroglobulin folds into its native state, it demonstrates information as a formative force. Each T4 molecule bound to thyroglobulin is literally in-formed by this protein matrix. The scaffold puts form into:

  • How the hormone is held in three-dimensional space
  • What microenvironmental conditions it experiences
  • How it relates to neighboring hormone molecules
  • When and how it will be released
  • What conformational memory it carries forward

This formative information—accumulated over millions of years of evolution—cannot be replicated in a reaction flask.

The Hydration Shell: Water as Information Carrier

Consider a dimension rarely discussed: every biological molecule exists within a hydration shell—a structured water envelope. Research into water’s fourth phase reveals it as an exquisite carrier of information and memory, capable of structuring itself in ways that drive molecular actions and cellular communication. The water surrounding naturally-produced hormones has been structured by living processes, carrying biophysical information that influences hormone behavior.

Remarkably, even when natural thyroid is desiccated, this information is not entirely lost. The freeze-drying process preserves molecular architecture, and upon rehydration in the body, water restructures itself according to the biological template, partially restoring the information field. It’s like a compressed file expanding back to its original form—not perfectly, but with far more fidelity than starting from scratch.

The synthetic hormone’s hydration shell, formed in industrial conditions, lacks this biological structuring entirely. The qualitative difference between natural and synthetic forms is ontologically vast—an insurmountable chasm that the false equivalence model cannot bridge.

Share Sayer Ji’s Substack

From “Subjective” to Structural: The Science of Patient Experience

When patients report life-changing improvements on natural thyroid—like Vicera co-founder Chrissy, who shared with me her experience of restored energy, mental clarity, weight loss, and emotional balance using the natural thyroid product she developed with her husband Heath —the medical establishment waves these away as ‘subjective’ or ‘merely anecdotal.’ But the molecular science reveals why dismissing these patient experiences is anti-scientific:

1. Conformational Intelligence: Each hormone bound to thyroglobulin exists in a specific three-dimensional state that carries information. The protein presents hormones to the body in evolutionarily optimized conformations that synthetic hormones cannot replicate.

2. Synergistic Delivery: The thyroglobulin complex ensures coordinated release of ALL thyroid hormones, creating cascading physiological effects patients experience as comprehensive well-being.

3. Information Beyond Chemistry: The 660,000 dalton thyroglobulin molecule represents biological information—protein folding patterns, binding sites, enzymatic cleavage points—all influencing how the body receives and processes hormones.

4. Evolutionary Recognition: Human physiology evolved with thyroglobulin-bound hormones. Our cellular machinery is optimized for this natural presentation. Synthetic T4 is a 70-year-old pharmaceutical approximation of a system refined over evolutionary time.

When patients report feeling profoundly different on natural versus synthetic thyroid, they’re experiencing the difference between medicine that carries biological information and medicine that doesn’t.

GREENMEDINFO VIDEO LIBRARY
She Lost 150 lbs. He Left the NFL. Now They’re Building a Healing Movement
SAYER JI·JUL 23
She Lost 150 lbs. He Left the NFL. Now They’re Building a Healing Movement
📝 Interview Summary
Read full story

The Science Is Devastating to FDA’s Position

The landmark 2013 Hoang study in the Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism revealed a truth the pharmaceutical industry desperately wants suppressed.[6] In this randomized, double-blind, crossover study with 70 patients: natural thyroid was preferred by nearly 3x as many patients as synthetic levothyroxine—48.6% preferred DTE versus only 18.6% for levothyroxine.

Those choosing natural thyroid reported dramatic improvements in their lived experience. Their scores showed statistically significant improvements (p < 0.001) in energy, mood, mental clarity, and quality of life.

Perhaps most tellingly, patients on DTE lost an average of 3-4 pounds without trying—actual metabolic activation from receiving the full hormone spectrum.

The 2021 Shakir study reinforced these findings. Among the most symptomatic patients—those failed most dramatically by synthetic monotherapy—switching to DTE produced significant improvements in mood, memory, and well-being.[7]

The Conversion Crisis No One Talks About

The dirty secret of synthetic thyroid treatment: up to 15% of patients cannot efficiently convert T4 to T3 due to genetic polymorphisms affecting deiodinase enzymes.[8] For these millions, synthetic levothyroxine is metabolic poison. Their bodies flood with inactive storage hormone while being starved of active T3.

When they report persistent symptoms despite “normal” TSH levels, they’re told it’s psychological. Meanwhile, their bodies deteriorate with:

  • Progressive metabolic dysfunction
  • Cognitive decline stealing mental sharpness
  • Weight gain resisting all efforts
  • Cardiovascular complications
  • Bone loss setting up fracturesShare

The Postmenopausal Crisis: FDA’s Betrayal of Women’s Health

Dr. Malone’s warning about postmenopausal women exposes a particularly cruel dimension. Research demonstrates that declining estrogen levels directly impair the body’s ability to convert T4 to active T3.[9] The FDA’s mandate forcing these women onto T4-only treatment is tantamount to prescribing metabolic dysfunction.

The calcitonin component becomes critical during this life stage. Studies reveal 50% of thyroidectomized patients develop osteopenia specifically from calcitonin deficiency.[10] Postmenopausal women already facing dramatic bone loss from estrogen decline are essentially guaranteed osteoporosis without access to DTE’s calcitonin.

Clinical evidence shows postmenopausal women on natural thyroid experience:

  • Better cognitive function
  • Improved energy levels
  • Modest but significant weight loss
  • Enhanced mood stability

Given that thyroid disease incidence is 5-20 times higher in women (much of which is preventable and even reversible through root-cause resolution medical approaches applied early enough)*, with highest rates in postmenopausal and elderly women, the FDA’s actions appear designed to maximally harm the population most dependent on comprehensive thyroid support.

*Consult the extensive Greenmedinfo.com Hypothyroidism database for more primary literature and translational articles on this health area.

The Safety Deception: 130 Years of Success

From Dr. Murray’s first use in 1891 through seven decades as standard treatment, DTE has 130 years of real-world safety data.[11] During this time, it transformed myxedema from death sentence to manageable condition.

The FDA’s own adverse event database tells the story they want buried. Between 1968-2025, only 500 adverse events were reported for DTE—approximately nine per year across millions of doses.[12] Compare this to synthetic levothyroxine:

  • Associations with increased lung cancer risk
  • Documented links to atrial fibrillation and fractures
  • Recent FDA recall of 160,000+ bottles for subpotency[13]

Most damning: the X account OpenVAERS’s analysis of FDA’s FAERS database shows synthetic medications have proportionally higher rates of injury and death, even accounting for larger user population.[14] Their conclusion: “There is no world in which taking natural hormone is more dangerous than the synthetics.”

The agency’s selective enforcement reveals the truth. Smaller manufacturers face recalls for minor potency variations, while AbbVie’s Armour Thyroid—made by the same company producing Synthroid—continues unimpeded. Safety isn’t the concern—market control is.

The Economic Conspiracy: Follow the Money

The global levothyroxine market generates $4 billion annually, projected to reach $5.88 billion by 2033.[15] The DTE market, serving only 1.5 million patients, represents a dangerous precedent that natural solutions can outperform patented drugs.

Synthetic levothyroxine costs 50-100 times less to produce than natural thyroid extract. When you can charge the same price for a product costing pennies versus dollars to make, eliminating competition becomes a business imperative.

AbbVie’s unique position reveals the conspiracy. This pharmaceutical giant, spending $4.53 million on lobbying, manufactures both Synthroid and Armour Thyroid.[16] While smaller competitors face extinction, AbbVie remains untouched. Consider:

  • RLC Labs ($30 million revenue) can’t afford regulatory lawyers
  • Acella Pharmaceuticals ($120 million) lacks political connections
  • These companies face extinction not for safety reasons, but for lacking financial firepower

Research documents that 73% of FDA advisory meetings include members with drug manufacturer ties.[17] The endgame is clear: force 1.5 million DTE patients onto synthetics, eliminate competition, establish precedent for banning natural alternatives.

The Resistance Movement

Multiple Change.org petitions have gathered tens of thousands of signatures. Board-certified endocrinologists who personally take DTE lead opposition campaigns. The Alliance for Natural Health and numerous medical professionals condemn the FDA’s action to “Protect Natural Thyroid!”, and have created a call to action you can participate in right here now.

The post-Chevron legal landscape offers hope. The Supreme Court’s elimination of automatic deference to agency interpretations means the FDA must prove clear Congressional authorization, scientific basis, and rational enforcement after 130 years—all impossible.

The Thyroid Disease CARE Act of 2024 (H.R.10297) specifically addresses “barriers that individuals diagnosed with thyroid disease face in accessing treatments.”[18]

The Call to Action

This is about medical freedom—the right to access ancestral foods and traditional medicines that have sustained human health for millennia.

What You Must Do NOW: [—-]

1. Contact the FDA Immediately:

Friday Funnies – The First Five Days… are the hardest…

Friday Funnies – The First Five Days

are the hardest…

ROBERT W MALONE MD, MS AUG 15


The “Science™” in the 1940s.


The “Science™” now..
















I don’t care where you live, everyone likes chicken dinner. Most varieties of chickens – particularly those docile, backyard egg laying breeds just aren’t fast enough.

If you want tick control on your farm, get guineas. 

Chickens just ain’t gonna last long enough to do any good.



A technical point – I think this is more of a Boomer Disaster Kit -This model had all been made obsolete – before GenXers hit the schoolyards.






Malone News is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

Upgrade to paid


Thanks for reading Malone News! This post is public, so feel free to crosspost, forward and/or share it on social media, including notes.

Share




It is almost the weekend folks, just remember: